- Joined
- Jan 22, 2013
- Messages
- 357
- Reaction score
- 608
Hi All!
Apologies if something like this has been posted before, I was unable to find something while looking through past threads. I have been offered positions to stay on as a psychologist at my post-doc site, which I am hoping to do.
In the state that I am in, a post-doc is not required for licensure. I am completing one so that on the off-chance that I would like to leave this state and apply to a state that requires a post-doc or apply for ABPP boarding I will have an easier time. Some states I have seen that seem to have post-doc requirements appear to be states like California, New York, Michigan, Oregon, etc- it seems like maybe almost any state aside from Washington, Alabama, and Utah?
Here are my questions:
If I become licensed in June, but my post-doc is not over until September, and I stay on as a post-doc with the same salary, title, responsibilities, didactic opportunities, and supervision requirements, will this still count as completing my post-doc? There would be 2-4 months of overlap where I am both licensed and also receiving supervision, but outside of that, nothing would change. Has anyone done this in states where a post-doc is required, and, because you kept your salary/rank/title/supervision/etc was this okay?
Also, I think my site wants to keep me so they are willing to bump my rank/salary up from post-doc to a psychologist on contingency immediately. If I were to keep receiving my 2 hours of supervision, continue in my didactic courses, and have the same responsibilities, would this still count as completing my post-doc as I am still doing the same things/receiving the same supervision, even though my rank/salary has increased? This is obviously the more attractive option but if this will jeopardize my chances of licensure in other states, I do not think it is worth it.
Finally, are both of these options so questionable that I should just stay unlicensed until September and not expose myself to any risk?
I have asked this to the psychologists at my site that were hired internally out of post-doc, but they did not have plans of leaving the state so this did not factor into their decision-making and they were unsure how this might impact me.
Thank you everyone for your time!
Apologies if something like this has been posted before, I was unable to find something while looking through past threads. I have been offered positions to stay on as a psychologist at my post-doc site, which I am hoping to do.
In the state that I am in, a post-doc is not required for licensure. I am completing one so that on the off-chance that I would like to leave this state and apply to a state that requires a post-doc or apply for ABPP boarding I will have an easier time. Some states I have seen that seem to have post-doc requirements appear to be states like California, New York, Michigan, Oregon, etc- it seems like maybe almost any state aside from Washington, Alabama, and Utah?
Here are my questions:
If I become licensed in June, but my post-doc is not over until September, and I stay on as a post-doc with the same salary, title, responsibilities, didactic opportunities, and supervision requirements, will this still count as completing my post-doc? There would be 2-4 months of overlap where I am both licensed and also receiving supervision, but outside of that, nothing would change. Has anyone done this in states where a post-doc is required, and, because you kept your salary/rank/title/supervision/etc was this okay?
Also, I think my site wants to keep me so they are willing to bump my rank/salary up from post-doc to a psychologist on contingency immediately. If I were to keep receiving my 2 hours of supervision, continue in my didactic courses, and have the same responsibilities, would this still count as completing my post-doc as I am still doing the same things/receiving the same supervision, even though my rank/salary has increased? This is obviously the more attractive option but if this will jeopardize my chances of licensure in other states, I do not think it is worth it.
Finally, are both of these options so questionable that I should just stay unlicensed until September and not expose myself to any risk?
I have asked this to the psychologists at my site that were hired internally out of post-doc, but they did not have plans of leaving the state so this did not factor into their decision-making and they were unsure how this might impact me.
Thank you everyone for your time!