- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 6,101
- Reaction score
- 3,104
Last edited:
This hypothetical patient saw me for two months totalI'm curious as to what you mean by "put her in the hospital." Was it an involuntary commitment? The reason I'm asking is that I have been in very tense situations with borderline patients where I'm toeing the line between protecting my own safety (medico-legal liability) v. hurting the patient therapeutically (over-reacting with the rapid escalation of the level of care effectively ending the therapy).
Basically, a move may not be legal abandonment; however, the patient could feel therapeutically abandoned. I'm coming from working with borderlines in long-term psychotherapy (TFP or GPM).
Helpful article: Medicolegal pitfalls in the treatment of borderline patients. - PubMed - NCBI
No. You did the correct thing. Always make sure you document what you did and why you did it.Was I wrong not to give her 30 days of meds? She has a history of overdose of medicine. I wouldn't want her to have extra.
And I didn't know what inpatient changes were to the meds.
Abandonment really boils down to a subjective feeling from the patient's point of view.
Abandonment really boils down to a subjective feeling from the patient's point of view
I'm not talking about abandonment in the psychodynamic sense, but rather in the termination of care or services sense.
And, I'm not saying that just because a patient believes or feels something, rightly or wrongly, they will prevail. I'm saying that becomes the question to be decided.
Can you cite the legal precedent for this please? I just don't believe that a subjective feeling becomes the question in any kind of lawsuit.