- Joined
- Jul 18, 2007
- Messages
- 130
- Reaction score
- 0
After this semester I will have taken all the core requirements, but I'll need to finish my bachelors. I'll graduate spring 2009 if I keep my planned schedule, so naturally I could apply for pharmacy school during fall 2008.
However, If I take an extra year in undergrad I will have worked as a tech, have more volunteer hours, have a chance to build a better relationship with professors for LOR's, and be able to take more upper division classes to prove I can handle the course load of a professional school. I am interested in taking the year long sequence of biochemistry, but that's about it for academics. If I did all of this I'd graduate spring 2010.
I know I've said an extra year in school is lost income. So SDN, would you spend time and money on a risky application you are not satisfied with just because you want to get your PharmD as soon as possible? My arguments convince me otherwise, but I'd like to hear the other opinions.
However, If I take an extra year in undergrad I will have worked as a tech, have more volunteer hours, have a chance to build a better relationship with professors for LOR's, and be able to take more upper division classes to prove I can handle the course load of a professional school. I am interested in taking the year long sequence of biochemistry, but that's about it for academics. If I did all of this I'd graduate spring 2010.
I know I've said an extra year in school is lost income. So SDN, would you spend time and money on a risky application you are not satisfied with just because you want to get your PharmD as soon as possible? My arguments convince me otherwise, but I'd like to hear the other opinions.