Apollyon said:
Well, we (as residents) wear jeans, and we go out to local places that are not formal, so maybe we are truly more "casual". I mean, what would you think of a place that says "casual" is a tie and no jacket? I, personally, have had enough of uptight, and I don't mind people wearing what they would wear when they were off - not on a job interview.
I think I am saying "casual", and you are saying "business casual".
Well, our pre-interview dinner/get together is considered "casual" but we (the residents) are specifically told not to wear jeans or scrubs and I would imagine that an interviewee would want to look pretty spiffy.
I never said that someone should wear a tie to these get togethers - a collared shirt (ie, not a t-shirt) and trousers should be sufficient. If someone shows up in a tie or suit that would be fine - many candidates do.
I agree there is a difference between business casual and casual and I would support the former as appropriate for a candidate. Don't most business manuals advise job candidates to dress "one step up" from their superiors? That means if residents are wearing jeans, then I would "dress one step up" to cotton trousers and a buttoned shirt.
(Shrug) I frankly don't care what someone wears as long as its neat and clean, but even when I go out with friends to a "casual" dinner I don't wear jeans. Those are for washing the car and going to the grocery store. Maybe its my upbringing - I wasn't allowed to wear jeans (or "dungarees" as my parents called them.
) to school and never wore them on social occasions. Didn't own my first pair until about age 22 or so. But that's me and I suspect many others are like that as well. Has nothing to do with being uptight, just that I was taught that jeans aren't really consider social wear - albeit I have relaxed (as have my parents) and we do actually wear them out in public now (used to be banned in our family). I think it looks nice to be a little more dressed up in public - not inappropriately so, I save my mink stole for the ballet, but rather just a tad more polished. Its how I'm most comfortable and I suspect most people are more comfortable erring on the safe side of being more formal. Fears of being underdressed in public are the stuff nightmares are made of.
SOME people do care what the interviewees wear and I'd rather take a chance on the "safe" side and go more dressed up - khakis, collared shirt, no sneakers, etc. sound good to me. Bottom line is that everyone has different expectations and its up to the interviewees to decide what's best for them. I don't care and as long as someone isn't outlandishly dressed and inappropriate I probably won't even notice what they're wearing and it certainly won't figure into my ranking decisions.