Shredder,
There is a great deal of "touchy-feely" that you will go through in 4 years of med school.
From the standpoint of getting into pathology, different people feel differently about this, but if I may quote a professor I respect -
There is no substitute for "being there". It will also help you later in communicating with clinicians if you have learnt to speak the language that is spoken on the frontlines.
A lot of people enter med school with an idea of what they want to do, but I think the numbers are in the ballpark of 2/3rds of them changing their minds by the time residency rolls around.
Pathology being the "bridge" between the clinical and basic sciences, is a little different in that sense.
I daresay most med schools do not put out scientists as a primary objective. Their responsibility is to graduate competent doctors, no matter what the field and whether or not you ever see a patient again. Schools have standards to maintain, and since all of us are potential patients it is not difficult to see why.
I would still go for med school if it is what you are interested in - but make sure that it IS what you are interested in.
To that end, I would spend a little more time in the hospital and clinic environment (and I don't mean the path dept!
😉 ) - it is quite different from a research lab.
You could certainly state that you are thinking of pathology, but that you are open to other fields of medicine as well. (And you would have to be, if you were considering spending 2 years of your life in training on the wards.)