If the president's behavior potentially harms the country, they should face impeachment. If it's a question of morals, save the tens of millions of dollars and wasted time and let the voters decide in the next election. He was a lame duck anyway.
It was a simple misunderstanding of the actual definition of "having sex"!
He did not inhale.
She won't be indicted
To who? God? The grand jury? Big deal. He obviously doesn't believe in god, and the grand jury needs to figure out if oral sex is actually "sex". It's all trivial.
Not a chance.
Mine too, but it's easy for me to do that since I vote in California where my vote is meaningless. As much as I like him, if I was voting in a swing state I'd have to think hard about voting for him, and voting for the Not-Clinton blowhard reality show narcissistic clown.
I don't know anything about the cattle thing, but I'll take a look. The other stuff is played out and depending on who you ask, range from "who cares" to "shoot her" on the controversy scale. I think some of the issues do hurt her reputability, which is why I'm not a fan. But you look at the business dealings or private/political decisions of any rich world leader and you'll find trash. A quarter century in the public eye makes it easy to dig up and manipulate a lot of stories.
It a big deal "especially" because it was trivial? No, it's barely a deal at all. Lying about weapons deals or espionage is a big deal. Not sex. To me it's disappointing that people have convinced themselves that this IS important. I don't care what the president says about sex unless he's telling people about how to do it well, then I'll listen.
Trump whines like a petulant child about the Republican primary being rigged, but the Democratic primary actually is. Clinton had all the superdelegates in her corner before it began. How does Sanders compete with that?
'nuff said.
It is BS and I hope they change it. But in reality at this point it's a private organization that can do whatever they want. They clearly wanted Hillary and they might as well have just made her the candidate instead of going through the motions of a primary. Although in the defense of BOTH parties, they spend a sh1tload of money attacking each other and weakening their ultimate nominee. At least they make it democratic to SOME degree.They WOULD be better off just saying "candidate X will represent us" from the start. As weak as Jeb Bush was, he probably would've been the nominee and likely would've beat Hillary. I might've even voted for him.
No one cares. It's the hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis and thousands of dead American soldiers that are the problem. And the instability and continued death. Otherwise he was great.
Yes he would. She's the weakest candidate since Mondale. Democrats have NO passion for her, and moderates don't like her. It would take a Trump or Cruz to get her elected.
I had to educate myself on some of these issues, because they do sound bad.
