- Joined
- Aug 3, 2020
- Messages
- 137
- Reaction score
- 194
- Points
- 376
- Medical Student
This is what we’ve been told by our 3rd and 4th years. Most were able to do procedures after watching them a few times.I disagree on the above comment - I did intubations and some central lines while at a community hospital without an affiliated residency as a third year student. Obviously you'll have to get lucky finding a preceptor that will teach and let you do procedures but I think you're much more likely to get to do procedures if at either a rural hospital or small-ish community hospital without a residency.
Intubation attempts fine. But no way am I having a 3rd year do central lines. Even if it is guiding things down the wireI disagree on the above comment - I did intubations and some central lines while at a community hospital without an affiliated residency as a third year student. Obviously you'll have to get lucky finding a preceptor that will teach and let you do procedures but I think you're much more likely to get to do procedures if at either a rural hospital or small-ish community hospital without a residency.
Yeah, perhaps in anesthesia with a glidescope they'd allow it, but a central is madness. I've personally witnessed a 3rd year IM resident kill someone when they created a massive pneumothorax. No way I'd let a 3rd year med student do it. In my med school I don't know anyone that was allowed to do one and we rotated at community programs without residentsIntubation attempts fine. But no way am I having a 3rd year do central lines. Even if it is guiding things down the wire
My third year anesthesia preceptor let me try DL intubation, central lines, and a lines. In hindsight, it was an amazing experience but also wild the that was allowed to happen.Yeah, perhaps in anesthesia with a glidescope they'd allow it, but a central is madness. I've personally witnessed a 3rd year IM resident kill someone when they created a massive pneumothorax. No way I'd let a 3rd year med student do it. In my med school I don't know anyone that was allowed to do one and we rotated at community programs without residents
to be fair, I never did anesthesia in medical school, so maybe them gas badasses roll differentMy third year anesthesia preceptor let me try DL intubation, central lines, and a lines. In hindsight, it was an amazing experience but also wild the that was allowed to happen.
I did intubations, pivs, abgs, art lines, central lines, thoras, paras, joint injections etc etc as a third year. Did more as a fourth year including various gyn stuff, excisions, biopsies. Did some chest tubes and more.Nobody will let a third year do procedures
Yeah, that doc was super confident and knew he could probably salvage any situationto be fair, I never did anesthesia in medical school, so maybe them gas badasses roll different
Wow, must be a regional thing then. I asked all my friends trained in the west coast if they had this experience and they said the most they did was suture in closing for the surgeonI did intubations, pivs, abgs, art lines, central lines, thoras, paras, joint injections etc etc as a third year. Did more as a fourth year including various gyn stuff, excisions, biopsies. Did some chest tubes and more.
I would maybe let them try a femoral. But only if the student had shown greater than usual aptitude. Our students don’t get much hands on experience most of the time all I let them do is close skin.Intubation attempts fine. But no way am I having a 3rd year do central lines. Even if it is guiding things down the wire
I've done intubations, central line, umbilical vein cath in the STU and NICU and a lateral canthotomy in the ED, a bunch of lesser invasive procedures during 3rd year. Depends on your institution, number of residents 'in-line,' etcNobody will let a third year do procedures
In academic settings the residents all had their numbers and were competent super early (IR and surg services especially). Then I got more in community settings with old attendings who trained the old way aka students actually had responsibilities lol.Wow, must be a regional thing then. I asked all my friends trained in the west coast if they had this experience and they said the most they did was suture in closing for the surgeon
Yeah, perhaps in anesthesia with a glidescope they'd allow it, but a central is madness. I've personally witnessed a 3rd year IM resident kill someone when they created a massive pneumothorax. No way I'd let a 3rd year med student do it. In my med school I don't know anyone that was allowed to do one and we rotated at community programs without residents
For a med student it is. The liability is high if any procedure goes down to ****. As a resident, you need itWhy is it madness? I did lines as a student and resident with progressively less supervision.
And I did at least 40-50 airways on my gas rotation in med school. Going to 4-5 rooms every morning isn't too tough, assuming the local culture is friendly to that.
For a med student it is. The liability is high if any procedure goes down to ****. As a resident, you need it
liability is not the same. you are putting someone with a license by the medical board to do a procedure. a medical student has no license and the liability is greater when you go to a courtroom and try to justify that you let a student do itA resident with 0 exp is like a student with 0 exp. Liability is the same. I agree it depends if you need it, so you see if that person is going into a field where they may need it.
liability is not the same. you are putting someone with a license by the medical board to do a procedure. a medical student has no license and the liability is greater when you go to a courtroom and try to justify that you let a student do it
I would love to see your legal citationsWhat you're saying has no actual legal basis other than you want to believe that.
The odds of you actually going to trial over something like that is incredibly low as well. Your carrier would settle for the same amount regardless of who was doing the procedure. If you were doing direct hands on supervision, the settlement would probably be the same as if you caused the issue doing it solo.
My main argument though, is that doctors love to pull up liability as a reason for something but don't actually have correct legal citations to support it.
lol you're the one making the claim dude. Burden of proof is on you.I would love to see your legal citations
You brought up the idea of legal citations and that I was wrong. I was willing to accept your claim because I thought you had some form of evidence, but I'm guessing you just made stuff up and tried to say "legal citations" to give it some credibility. If we're talking about a first claim, you were the first to say there is no difference between letting a legally licensed trainee and a medical student do somethinglol you're the one making the claim dude. Burden of proof is on you.
Same. I've seen residents do serious damage screwing up a central line. Would be extremely hard to explain in a malpractice claim. Central lines are a procedure with amongst the highest complication rates when compared against other common proceduresIntubation attempts fine. But no way am I having a 3rd year do central lines. Even if it is guiding things down the wire
There are plenty of law offices that have a notabke portion of their malpractice cases revolving around central lines in big metros. The combination of high risk procedure+low experience operator is a very well known cause of procedure error to the point that many hospitals have special line teams to mitigate the legal risk of them. To shrug it off as not a big deal is just factually incorrect.lol you're the one making the claim dude. Burden of proof is on you.