- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
- Messages
- 2,168
- Reaction score
- 1,659
Thank you Donald Trump.
?
Thank you Donald Trump.
The old no worse than the flu argument....come on even Trump gave that one up
Yes the death rate will be far less than 1%. It'll probably be somewhere b/w 0.2-0.5%. We'll see in a few months. But that's where I'm putting my money.Swedish epidemiologists: “Tsunami of a mild” disease. Death rate 0.2% or less.(H Flu 0.1%)
Do we agree with this assessment??
I do like the sound of that deep cleans with an electrostatic misting system with hospital grade disinfectant. We needs to get some of that
Ducttape posted this in the other thread. NYT looked exclusively at average death rates and it's significantly higher around the workd.I am asking questions, not offering theories or insights.
I think until we see how many extra deaths occurred from 2/1/20 to 6/30/20 as compared to the 5 year average, we are only part of the problem.
What if there is no excess death from COVID? What if the same people are dying from COVID who would have died from flu, MI, CVA? It is still a terrible thing.
I know the media overblows everything. But by how much? We will know in a few months.
flu deaths are reported separately from COVID deaths by the CDC and these other sources.I am asking questions, not offering theories or insights.
I think until we see how many extra deaths occurred from 2/1/20 to 6/30/20 as compared to the 5 year average, we are only part of the problem.
What if there is no excess death from COVID? What if the same people are dying from COVID who would have died from flu, MI, CVA? It is still a terrible thing.
I know the media overblows everything. But by how much? We will know in a few months.
so, im thinking that we will start doing our shots pretty soon. i can reasonably tell a patient that they need to wait several weeks for an ESI or RF. i cant reasonably tell them they need to wait months and months with no end in sight. at some point, these "maintenance injections" do become a medical necessity. i am in a pretty hard hit state, but i think that by early-ish May, the shots will start to resume in earnest.....
Full schedule today...
I'm not sure we learned lessons from 1918.
case in point - reopening early.
this article notes that those cities that reopened early had much greater issues with the second wave than those that kept restrictions in place until much longer.
INSIDER TODAY: What happens if we reopen too early? Let's look at 1918.
States are starting to reopen as cases of coronavirus plateau. Evidence from the 1918 flu pandemic suggests that is a mistake.www.businessinsider.com
I think that's why Fauci et al are concerned with reopening too soon. maybe this time we will get lucky...
This is not black and white - we aren’t a casino or movie theater where the only justification for reopening is economic. Whether elective medical procedures should proceed depends on the area. My county has had just a couple cases diagnosed in the past 2 weeks. Should I continue to deny patients procedures and evals? If not reopening now then when? If this isn’t low enough disease activity then I would be waiting until there is widespread vaccine rollout and herd immunity. And as for clinic patients, it’s all elective until it isn’t - had a new patient a couple weeks ago with severe neck pain and headaches that started in September. Would have rejected it on that basis if totally closed down, and told her to go to the ER if it was that severe. Turns out she had been to the ER already, and her PCP, and had an MRI of her neck a month ago, and no one (including the radiologist) noticed the golf ball sized cyst in her cerebellum. She went from my office to the hospital, and had surgery the day after I saw her. Sure, that’s a once in a lifetime catch (hopefully) but I think about that a lot in balancing whether to see patients. Telemed as much as possible, and the schedulers are instructed to ask people if they feel it can wait, but I’m still seeing patients. Better to come see me than go to urgent care from a COVID risk perspective.you brag as if you are doing a good thing.
$$$$$ > life
shame
This is not black and white - we aren’t a casino or movie theater where the only justification for reopening is economic. Whether elective medical procedures should proceed depends on the area. My county has had just a couple cases diagnosed in the past 2 weeks. Should I continue to deny patients procedures and evals? If not reopening now then when? If this isn’t low enough disease activity then I would be waiting until there is widespread vaccine rollout and herd immunity. And as for clinic patients, it’s all elective until it isn’t - had a new patient a couple weeks ago with severe neck pain and headaches that started in September. Would have rejected it on that basis if totally closed down, and told her to go to the ER if it was that severe. Turns out she had been to the ER already, and her PCP, and had an MRI of her neck a month ago, and no one (including the radiologist) noticed the golf ball sized cyst in her cerebellum. She went from my office to the hospital, and had surgery the day after I saw her. Sure, that’s a once in a lifetime catch (hopefully) but I think about that a lot in balancing whether to see patients. Telemed as much as possible, and the schedulers are instructed to ask people if they feel it can wait, but I’m still seeing patients. Better to come see me than go to urgent care from a COVID risk perspective.
you brag as if you are doing a good thing.
$$$$$ > life
shame
certainly there are gray areas, and there definitely will come a time when cases are no longer "elective". im starting to do some shots as well. but a full clinic? how many of those are mbbs? mbb f/u? sij? hips and shoulders?
you should not be opening your doors as if we are back to normal. if you have screened the patients, and they all need an in-person visit, then thats a different story.
Put an N95 mask on, have your patients put masks on, and go to work.
Or don't.
Your call.
Put an N95 mask on, have your patients put masks on, and go to work.
Or don't.
Your call.
Watch your step getting down from the soap box.
So what if he did those injections? If he took steps to mitigate risk then there is nothing to criticize at all. Stay home if you want if you think its the best way to go for your patients. I think he's doing the right thing.
Your post means nothing to me.
funny, it wasnt directed at you. feel a bit insecure or guilty do you?
Yeah yeah. I messed up. But too late on my reasoning spreadingYou quoted his post calling his behavior shameful, bro. His response was to yours. Don't let your illogical reasoning spread to all aspects of your life.
Welp here ya go. The CDC caught up with my original estimateYes the death rate will be far less than 1%. It'll probably be somewhere b/w 0.2-0.5%. We'll see in a few months. But that's where I'm putting my money.
Those numbers seem too low based on mass casualty events like the one in Washington.Welp here ya go. The CDC caught up with my original estimate
(Remember, in March, the World Health Organization estimated a 3.4% fatality rate and Dr. Anthony Fauci estimated that the fatality rate of the coronavirus was about 2%.)
Fatality rate now per new CDC estimates:
0-49 years old: .05%
50-64 years old: .2%
65+ years old: 1.3%
Overall ages: .4%
According to the CDC’s current best estimate, the case fatality rate of the coronavirus is .4%. And that’s just among symptomatic cases, which, the CDC estimates, is 65% of all cases. This means the CDC estimates that the fatality rate for all infections across all age groups, symptomatic as well as asymptomatic, is approximately
.26%
Welp here ya go. The CDC caught up with my original estimate
(Remember, in March, the World Health Organization estimated a 3.4% fatality rate and Dr. Anthony Fauci estimated that the fatality rate of the coronavirus was about 2%.)
Fatality rate now per new CDC estimates:
0-49 years old: .05%
50-64 years old: .2%
65+ years old: 1.3%
Overall ages: .4%
According to the CDC’s current best estimate, the case fatality rate of the coronavirus is .4%. And that’s just among symptomatic cases, which, the CDC estimates, is 65% of all cases. This means the CDC estimates that the fatality rate for all infections across all age groups, symptomatic as well as asymptomatic, is approximately
.26%
doesnt work if we dont all follow the rules. this isnt the wild wild west. what pmrmd decides to do affects ssdoc33. believe me, i wish that wasnt the case. if you dont like listening to my soapbox speech, then dont give me a reason to give one. frankly, if we had more people in gvt thinking like me and fewer thinking like you, we would be in a lot better shape. the main reason america has BY FAR the worst outbreak in the world (>4x any other country) is because we have cowboys who think they know better. they dont. you dont, and certainly the white house doesnt
.The only thing that is clear is that the widespread shutdowns were the wrong approach and targeted limitations would have been better.
CDC websiteSource?
CDC website
Please provide evidence for this statement. We don’t want to make arrogant presumptions now do we
Reasonable points...
How Fear, Groupthink Drove Unnecessary Global Lockdowns | RealClearPolitics
Reliance on Faulty Models In the face of a novel virus threat, China clamped down on its citizens. Academics used faulty information to build faulty models....www.realclearpolitics.com
Over 38 million unemployed despite the fact the Italian data showed death was occurring in not just geriatrics, but those over 80...
Initial quarantine definitely warranted, but if I'm living in South Dakota with a family owned business and this ends us...F you.
Yeah. But the pressing question is: who really cares about anyone who lives in South Dakota...?
Idiotic comment, but let's swap SD for dozens of other states.
Whoever you are isn't half as smart or important as you may believe.
Intelligent comment. Almost made sense
My statement was soooo hard to follow and confusing...
There are 30 and possibly up to 40 states that have been largely spared from significant COVID-19.
In the states hit the hardest, look at the locations of cases and they're all large metro areas.
The virus does not care about state boundaries, so take each major city that has been hit with COVID-19 and draw a circle around it that spans X miles in diameter and shut it down.
Let the 95% of the rest of our nation continue to thrive and work and earn money without having to push trillions of dollars of Monopoly money into the economy.
I think this is actually quite simple.
Because that population DIES, thats why.The CDC data just posted. Why do we have about 20% unemployment for a virus that mainly harmed a select population?