- Joined
- Jul 5, 2007
- Messages
- 78
- Reaction score
- 4
So here's my irritation with deciding which programs to apply to. In short, I have acquired a small group of attending surgeons who know me pretty well as a result of me showing my face, doing research, and being interested in surgery for a long time. Now that I am applying, it's SO CRAZY to hear the thoughts of places that different attendings tell me.
"Penn is an over-rated program which you shouldn't even waste your time with since they make you do a secondary" is what my program director tells me
then my chairman says "Decent program, you should look into it"
and then my mentor (surgeon) says "it's a fabulous program!"
honestly. and, the story HONESTLY goes visa versa for SO MANY examples. I've heard the WORSTE and the BEST things from attendings about BID, Brigham, MGH, Columbia, Yale, Standford, UCLA. It's honestly ridiculous.
The REASON it's stressful is because while I KNOW i'm just gonna end up applying to them all, it's weird 'cuz some of these attendings seem frustated that I don't heed their advice. NO JOKE. "WHY are you applying to Penn? I told you it's worthless... you should come here instead." And i'm like thinking to myself "hold on buddy, let me make my own decision."
It's obvious that attendings, program directors, and chairman form their thoughts/preferences about programs based upon their idiosyncratic bias and experiences. AND IT SUCKS, because, HONESTLY I WENT ONE DAY FROM MY PROGRAM DIRECTOR TO MY CHAIRMAN (the day i went to get my letters of rec) and they told me COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS! If your chair is a CT surgeon or an endocrine surgeon, OBVIOUSLY they're probably friends with chairs who are in the same field, and THEREFORE automatically think that ENTIRE program must be good. I think that's the trend... and it's RIDICULOUS.
Now, I know NOTHING about Penn. Never been there. but I *DOUBT* they suck. I *DOUBT* i'll have a horrible experience at my interview. Sure, it may not (but it may be!) be my first choice.... but some of this advice just seems ridiculous. NOT TO MENTION THE UN-NAMED INSTITUTION THAT I'M AT ISN'T THAT HOT, but they tend to think we're like the best. so....
just venting
thoughts?
ahhhhhhhhhhh!
"Penn is an over-rated program which you shouldn't even waste your time with since they make you do a secondary" is what my program director tells me
then my chairman says "Decent program, you should look into it"
and then my mentor (surgeon) says "it's a fabulous program!"
honestly. and, the story HONESTLY goes visa versa for SO MANY examples. I've heard the WORSTE and the BEST things from attendings about BID, Brigham, MGH, Columbia, Yale, Standford, UCLA. It's honestly ridiculous.
The REASON it's stressful is because while I KNOW i'm just gonna end up applying to them all, it's weird 'cuz some of these attendings seem frustated that I don't heed their advice. NO JOKE. "WHY are you applying to Penn? I told you it's worthless... you should come here instead." And i'm like thinking to myself "hold on buddy, let me make my own decision."
It's obvious that attendings, program directors, and chairman form their thoughts/preferences about programs based upon their idiosyncratic bias and experiences. AND IT SUCKS, because, HONESTLY I WENT ONE DAY FROM MY PROGRAM DIRECTOR TO MY CHAIRMAN (the day i went to get my letters of rec) and they told me COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS! If your chair is a CT surgeon or an endocrine surgeon, OBVIOUSLY they're probably friends with chairs who are in the same field, and THEREFORE automatically think that ENTIRE program must be good. I think that's the trend... and it's RIDICULOUS.
Now, I know NOTHING about Penn. Never been there. but I *DOUBT* they suck. I *DOUBT* i'll have a horrible experience at my interview. Sure, it may not (but it may be!) be my first choice.... but some of this advice just seems ridiculous. NOT TO MENTION THE UN-NAMED INSTITUTION THAT I'M AT ISN'T THAT HOT, but they tend to think we're like the best. so....
just venting
thoughts?
ahhhhhhhhhhh!