- Joined
- Jul 17, 2014
- Messages
- 612
- Reaction score
- 1,179
When reviewing applicants (either via VSLO or ERAS), do programs take into consideration an applicant's stated desire to live/practice within that program's particular area after training? Having strong ties to the area is one thing and well-established (i.e.: I have family here/am from here originally and therefore would like to attend residency here) versus intent to stay after completion of training (i.e.: my goal is to practice x-field in your region upon completion of my training, and therefore would like to attend residency here). Or is the latter assumed based on the former and by virtue of applying to their program?
Do programs differentiate between the two motivations (especially considering many residents will move away from the area for fellowship)? Does it help to double-down and convey both desires when communicating with programs?
Do programs differentiate between the two motivations (especially considering many residents will move away from the area for fellowship)? Does it help to double-down and convey both desires when communicating with programs?