In NRMP's charting outcomes data, there is a table where they correlate the number of programs applicants rank and the probability of matching. I noticed that even for the most competitive specialties, the probability of matching is almost 100% if one ranks more than 18 programs. Why are there still unmatched graduates when one simply has to rank a large number of programs to ensure matching? I guess there's no meaning in ranking a program if one isn't invited for an interview, and the number of interviews received could be the limiting factor. Is there anything that I am missing? Thanks a lot.
Q's about charting outcomes
- Thread starter echod
- Start date
QofQuimica
Seriously, dude, I think you're overreacting....
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2004
- Messages
- 18,899
- Reaction score
- 4,295
I think you're right that it's due to a limited number of interviews. I mean, it's not like everyone can score 18+ derm invites just because they apply to 30+ programs. Probably the people who do are the rock star types who would have matched even with many fewer invites.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2002
- Messages
- 15,122
- Reaction score
- 9,509
Yes, number of interviews is the limiting factor. So you apply to a lot of programs in hopes that you get enough interviews. How many you need to apply to in order to get that number of interviews varies based on a lot of factors that one has little sense of going into this process. I'm applying to 30 programs, hoping to rank 12-15. Is that too many I'm applying to? Not enough? Everyone seems to have a different opinion.
Note that the line approaches 100% but rarely, if ever, hits it. I've seen some real strange cases of that <5% cohort from very decent, personable people (i.e. ranked 12+ programs, didn't match). Bad luck is a scary outcome.
