- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,018
- Reaction score
- 559
Is anyone doing QL for THR or arthroscopy? I've done it a bunch for anterior THR and it works really well but I'd like to get some input on traditional THR. Comparison to FIB? Thoughts?
Is anyone doing QL for THR or arthroscopy? I've done it a bunch for anterior THR and it works really well but I'd like to get some input on traditional THR. Comparison to FIB? Thoughts?
Is anyone doing QL for THR or arthroscopy? I've done it a bunch for anterior THR and it works really well but I'd like to get some input on traditional THR. Comparison to FIB? Thoughts?
We got rid of duramorph... No Foley's and worried about retention plus no need for pulse ox bed. Anterior hips are less painful for sure.Yes that is the "problem" For most of us doing spinal for total hips (plus duramorph) Is it worth it to do QL as well? Also how are you guys billing it?
More painfull in young patient than in old osteoporotic ladies.Hips don't really hurt that much anyways, but seems like an interesting idea...
How much local are you using green? 20cc? And are you doing the QL1/2 or the deeper one?
25-30cc, 0.5% bupi with 5mcg/ml epi, QL1/2 exclusively. Patients tolerate well and we get good views consistently. Great block.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Is anyone doing QL for THR or arthroscopy? I've done it a bunch for anterior THR and it works really well but I'd like to get some input on traditional THR. Comparison to FIB? Thoughts?
25-30cc, 0.5% bupi with 5mcg/ml epi, QL1/2 exclusively. Patients tolerate well and we get good views consistently. Great block.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
More painfull in young patient than in old osteoporotic ladies.
Yea but for postop the block is still helpful. With duramorph I'm not sure, but without it looks like it makes a difference. Not sure where you guys are, but it surgeons are moving towards 23hr total joints eventually and duramorph is not ideal for that. A block that can provide 24 hr pain control with no motor block... Now that's more like it 🙂Yes but you spinal them usually
Yea but for postop the block is still helpful. With duramorph I'm not sure, but without it looks like it makes a difference. Not sure where you guys are, but it surgeons are moving towards 23hr total joints eventually and duramorph is not ideal for that. A block that can provide 24 hr pain control with no motor block... Now that's more like it 🙂Yes but you spinal them usually
Yea but for postop the block is still helpful. With duramorph I'm not sure, but without it looks like it makes a difference. Not sure where you guys are, but it surgeons are moving towards 23hr total joints eventually and duramorph is not ideal for that. A block that can provide 24 hr pain control with no motor block... Now that's more like it 🙂
Wouldn't say that, at least with our surgeons. Maybe surgical technique plays a role, but we spinal everyone and our pts without block still have pain even with multimodals.But how do you know its providing pain relief vs the pain control is already sufficient with spinal and current techniques. THRs go well with a spinal and nothing else. For hips at least, pain is usually not limiting DC, without any block. So why bother? You could do straight GA for most hips and DC the person in 23 hrs.
But how do you know its providing pain relief vs the pain control is already sufficient with spinal and current techniques. THRs go well with a spinal and nothing else. For hips at least, pain is usually not limiting DC, without any block. So why bother? You could do straight GA for most hips and DC the person in 23 hrs.
Blade if surg using 1 vial of exparel we would still be fine with an additional 25cc of .25% bup right.
Is the CPT same as TAP block 64450?
This might be a worthwhile block for our group to add for patients who cannot receive a spinal or for the few surgeons who take 4 hrs to do a hip.
Is the CPT same as TAP block 64450?
Not a billing expert by any stretch but I believe it is coded as 64450 (other nerve block).
TAP is actually coded differently as of 2015:
New CPT Codes Take Effect
Look at the picture below as it regards the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous nerve. IMHO, that is the nerve we are likely "targeting" when we perform a QL block on a patient presenting for a total hip replacement (particularly the anterior approach).
If the goal is to hit the LFC, then a QL block seems like a roundabout way to get there. The LFC is easily visualized on U/S up high on the anterior thigh just below the ASIS. In fact, you've probably seen it every time you've done a Fem block, and just never knew it was there. In residency, we were actually trained to identify it when doing Fem caths (which we approached more laterally to give the cath more meat to travel through to avoid dislodgment) so as not to pierce it and leave the patient with a meralgia parasthetica. The LFC lives within the meat of the Tensor Fascia Lata which is the small spindle shaped muscle which lies right at the lateral border of the Sartorius. In the vast majority of patients, the nerve is seen as a hyperechoic point within the TFL. It'so easy to numb it here, which I have done for muscle biopsy cases.
Salty, I would appreciate a picture or a diagram. I've never seen the LFC on ultrasound.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I think QL3 is the QL block most likely to get some motor weakness due to the vicinity of the Lumbar plexus. For that reason, I prefer QL1 or QL2 blocks.
Ortho Surgeons asked me not to do LFCN blocks on Anterior hips due to close proximity to incision. Hence, I do QL or Lumbar Plexus Blocks when needed for Anterior hips. Perhaps, the BEST solution is a T10 or L1 Erector Spinae Block? I can vouch that these ESP blocks work quite will with a catheter at 10 mls per hour.
https://www.jcafulltextonline.com/article/S0952-8180(17)31135-2/abstract
Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block at L-4 transverse process level provides effective postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty
I actually just did this (erector spinae) today for a postop hip with severe pain who wants to avoid opioids and whose surgeon does not want any motor weakness. I wanted to try T12 transverse process, but L4 was a lot easier to find and had what seemed like a clear plane between it and the overlying ES. I still found it challenging getting the ideal spread pattern, but eventually I think I got the bilateral lift. Pt reported significant pain improvement about 10 minutes after bolus of .125% bupi. No sensory dermatomal change in thigh. Put in a catheter and set at 8cc/hr. Had to pull it back to only 2cm beyond needle tip to get ideal spread pattern - hopefully doesn't dislodge