- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 4,930
- Reaction score
- 6,855
Cmon, dude, it may not be our call but an anesthesiologist who has been around the block on OB is more than capable of understanding the reasoning. Is the mother at risk for an impending serious physiological derangement? Is the fetus? If the answer to both these is no then I don't think having the OB explain the rationale for a twin section at 9pm is me being an obstructionist. Likewise, if someone wants to question my glidescope use, I have no problem educating them and explaining to them that while the MP was ok, the TM and neck circumference are bad and the literature about OB airway says blah blah
They gave you the rationale in the stem. If the OB is ok at 9 and the nurse are ok with 9 but the anesthesiologist says no because it’s elective, who’s being the obstructionist?
No one likes it and trust me you’re getting this from they guy who loathes OB and loathes C sections even more but I also don’t like my colleagues names brought up in meetings when 1 hour of their life could’ve prevented it.
I also understand a lot of this has to do with type of practice and where your practice is located. As I said in another post, my practice is in a location where people are lined up waiting to get a piece so we do what we can to stay in the good graces, off the radar, and not the topic of meetings. I want them only to mention the 3 A’s when it comes to my group. To quote The Wire, “It’s all in the game”. Im sure in other places you can’t probably put your foot down with less worry.