Question about MD/DO merger

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
But I can tell you what you said ^ is not the rule for MD students.

Unless you go to a top 20 school it kind of is for the top programs. No MD student at say NYMC is going to MGH for IM if they are at the bottom of their class, poor Step score, and no honors on rotations...

You might be an "expert" on SDN and have a few MD friends but it is different when you don't go to their school. So no, you don't know like students who are actually MD students. I can tell you, a lot of the crap that people talk on SDN about the school I attend is just junk. But I know since I go there. It is easy to sit in our armchair as DO students and guess at what is going on.

You don't need to go to a school to know how the students at the bottom of their class match...
 
First and foremost, because residency programs are created with taxpayer money for US grads, not for foreign grads. There's a push going on right now supported by the AMA and the AOA trying to implement a rule that would require PDs to consider US grads before IMGs.

I agree with this point. Strongly.
 
I guess we should as the MD students on this forum what they have experienced. They are probably more the experts than we are when it comes to who from their school matches where.

Okay you said “ask them”, but we already have seen from the bottom of the MD classes...there are USMD students on here every year with board failures, <200 Step 1, repeat years, who are worried about matching into path, or fail to match at all. Not sure why you insist on saying every single USMD matched above every single DO. This doesn’t even make sense lol. Yes on average USMD as a population will match better than DO as a population, but there is definite overlap between the two populations.
 
I've been looking at residency programs on Freida with close to 50% IMGs. Not all places consider US grads over IMGs.
Which ones? Those are usually programs that no one's grandma has ever heard about, and most US grads would never dream of applying to them. It's not like PDs are having wet dreams about filling up their spots with half of the third world physician workforce, while in the meantime hundreds of qualified, well-spoken HMS grads without visa issues are banging at the door begging them for interviews.
 
Okay you said “ask them”, but we already have seen from the bottom of the MD classes...there are USMD students on here every year with board failures, <200 Step 1, repeat years, who are worried about matching into path, or fail to match at all. Not sure why you insist on saying every single USMD matched above every single DO. This doesn’t even make sense lol. Yes on average USMD as a population will match better than DO as a population, but there is definite overlap between the two populations.
It’s ironic that only DO students including yourself are answering this lol
 
Unless you go to a top 20 school it kind of is for the top programs. No MD student at say NYMC is going to MGH for IM if they are at the bottom of their class, poor Step score, and no honors on rotations...



You don't need to go to a school to know how the students at the bottom of their class match...
Again. I will say that the « top » DO students from my school and others that I know of have matched into good programs that have traditionally been open to DOs - those with several DO students on their roster already. Maybe these programa have people who weren’t too students. We don’t see that many going into top specialties that weren’t former AOA sites. Yes you might have a few going to plastics wherever and they are breaking down barriers - that’s cool. But there aren’t many. As in I can count on two hands maybe. And from what I remember there are like what 30 ish schools. Let’s say each school is capable of producing 2 great candidates - as you mention >260+ boards whatever. We should have anywhere from 60-70 in the pipeline at the best residencies in the nation. This is not the case obviously. So explain that?
 
We don’t see that many going into top specialties that weren’t former AOA sites.

You clearly ignored the part where I included these matches because, brace yourself, an ortho match is an ortho match.
Yes you might have a few going to plastics wherever and they are breaking down barriers - that’s cool. But there aren’t many. As in I can count on two hands maybe. And from what I remember there are like what 30 ish schools. Let’s say each school is capable of producing 2 great candidates - as you mention >260+ boards whatever. We should have anywhere from 60-70 in the pipeline at the best residencies in the nation. This is not the case obviously. So explain that?

Every school does have about 2ish fantastic matches.... I mean TCOM had 3 IR matches alone, and a traditional MD urology, and optho, and MD ENT.... so....

This is a classic moving of the goalposts. Your statement was that bottom of the class MD students have more opportunities than top DO students, which is the statement I have been refuting. I haven't been trying to argue against the fact that DOs have a harder time getting into top programs, which is obviously true.
 
Which ones? Those are usually programs that no one's grandma has ever heard about, and most US grads would never dream of applying to them. It's not like PDs are having wet dreams about filling up their spots with half of the third world physician workforce, while in the meantime hundreds of qualified, well-spoken HMS grads without visa issues are banging at the door begging them for interviews.
Just from a quick search:

UAMS-Little Rock IM program 63 spots 40% IMGs.

University of Kansas Wichita IM program 42 spots 41% IMGs.

University of Missouri Columbia IM program 70 spots 30% IMGs.

Saint Louis University IM program 87 spots 25% IMGs.

Baton Rouge General IM program 30 spots 88% IMGs.

LSU Health Sciences Center IM program 26 spots 57% IMGs.

BronxCare Health system IM program 102 spots and 100% IMGs.

Lincoln Medical and Mental health center IM program 116 spots 93% IMGs.

Kingsbrook Jewish Medical center IM program 97 spots 100% IMGs.
 
Last edited:
Just from a quick search:

UAMS-Little Rock IM program 63 spots 40% IMGs.

University of Kansas Wichita IM program 42 spots 41% IMGs.

University of Missouri Columbia IM program 70 spots 30% IMGs.

Saint Louis University IM program 87 spots 25% IMGs.

Baton Rouge General IM program 30 spots 88% IMGs.

LSU Health Sciences Center IM program 26 spots 57% IMGs.

BronxCare Health system IM program 102 spots and 100% IMGs.

Lincoln Medical and Mental health center IM program 116 spot 93% IMGs.

Kingsbrook Jewish Medical center IM program 97 spots 100% IMGs.
The gestalt on SDN from our wise resident colleagues is that a high # of IMGs implies that the place is either malignant and/or a sweatshop.
 
The gestalt on SDN from our wise resident colleagues is that a high # of IMGs implies that the place is either malignant and/or a sweatshop.
But some of these are University programs.
 
The gestalt on SDN from our wise resident colleagues is that a high # of IMGs implies that the place is either malignant and/or a sweatshop.
They are probably getting $$ under the table somehow too. Getting residency in the US as an IMG is almost impossible. I am always shocked at how we DOs we complain about IMGs taking spots when the DO bias is a larger problem. And yes, these places are probably (and unfortunately) sweatshops but they give people from other countries opportunities to be doctors here. Just fyi - Kingsbrook is in Brooklyn and tons of people would love to work in Brooklyn so I'm sure it is not an issue of finding applicants.
 
People will sacrifice a lot to train at a really big name, including the right to remain remotely close to the 80 hour limit.
From what I've learned here on SDN, I was under the impression that University IM programs were the best programs if you want to keep your options open for fellowships later. I guess I was wrong.
 
From what I've learned here on SDN, I was under the impression that University IM programs were the best programs if you want to keep your options open for fellowships later. I guess I was wrong.
One thing that I've learned from our SDN colleagues is that you have to talk to the experts (IM residents and attendings) to learn who is good, and who isn't. The mere name of a program doesn't mean anything.
 
Just from a quick search:

UAMS-Little Rock IM program 63 spots 40% IMGs.

University of Kansas Wichita IM program 42 spots 41% IMGs.

University of Missouri Columbia IM program 70 spots 30% IMGs.

Saint Louis University IM program 87 spots 25% IMGs.

Baton Rouge General IM program 30 spots 88% IMGs.

LSU Health Sciences Center IM program 26 spots 57% IMGs.

BronxCare Health system IM program 102 spots and 100% IMGs.

Lincoln Medical and Mental health center IM program 116 spots 93% IMGs.

Kingsbrook Jewish Medical center IM program 97 spots 100% IMGs.
Are these FREIDA numbers or did you go to the program website and calculate?

I'm assuming FREIDA, because a spot check on your numbers from the SLU website shows 13 IMG of a total of 81 residents, making 16%. None of those 13 are Americans from Caribbean schools.
 
From what I've learned here on SDN, I was under the impression that University IM programs were the best programs if you want to keep your options open for fellowships later. I guess I was wrong.

Competitive fellowships want fellows who are experienced and have worked hard throughout residency. Top residencies provide that.

It's like clerkships. The resident says something like "ok, it's 5 pm. I'm going to see some GI consults that just came in, and the students are dismissed." Most students will leave. Occasionally an interested student will ask if they can tag along, because they are interested in GI, even though it's getting late and they are now doing this on their free time. Those same highly motivated students are going to be less worried about their hours in residency than the people who hit the door the second the resident finished "-missed."
 
Top