Does anyone think Medical College of Wisconsin sounds likes a lesser program than it is simply because of the name? Do you think this factors into how people rank it?
Does anyone think Medical College of Wisconsin sounds likes a lesser program than it is simply because of the name? Do you think this factors into how people rank it?
Does anyone think Medical College of Wisconsin sounds likes a lesser program than it is simply because of the name? Do you think this factors into how people rank it?
no. If someone bases a ranking on what a program name sounds like, I'm not clear how they got this far in their education.
I agree entirely. This is just my impression based on rank lists I've been scouring. It seems from an actual strength vs weakness vs quality of life perspective, it's falling further down people's ROL than is justifiable if it wasn't for "name". I know everyone has their own reasons for how they rank, but in spite of the lip service, it genuinely does appear than many people are ranking on perception of prestige.
Or it could be the perception that Milwaukee is somewhat less desirable than other competing midwestern locations--particularly Madison.
Or it could be the perception that Milwaukee is somewhat less desirable than other competing midwestern locations--particularly Madison.
Yep, this is pretty much it. I thought very highly of their program when I interviewed last year. The only problem I see is the weather there.
I'd gladly put up with a Great Lakes winter if I avoid Mississippi Delta summers.
To each their own.
I agree entirely. This is just my impression based on rank lists I've been scouring. It seems from an actual strength vs weakness vs quality of life perspective, it's falling further down people's ROL than is justifiable if it wasn't for "name". I know everyone has their own reasons for how they rank, but in spite of the lip service, it genuinely does appear than many people are ranking on perception of prestige.
Different people have different reasons. I initially couldn't understand why people rank WashU so low... I figured it might be because they didn't want a biologically-focused program, but they often rank UW or UCSD or Pitt above WashU (and if they didn't want a biological program, they wouldn't have interviewed at WashU). And I thought it might be because of the name (even though WashU is a name brand in the medical field, nobody else knows what it is), but then again, UW and UCSD and Pitt.
Then I realized it's probably just because of St. Louis. I think the same is probably true for MCW.
who are these 'people' you refer to? You talk about this stuff in a way that is completely foreign to reality. There is no concencus of any sort on how UCSD compares to WashU or Pitt for example. I'm sure people do make decisions on how to rank those programs sometimes relative to each other, but that's a different argument than trying to decide which one is better/worse.
I mean yeah, most people would definately say Columbia or UCSF or MHG is 'higher' than Maimonides, but you seem to have this idea that there are 6 or 7 different 'tiers' of programs.......that really isn't the case.
IIf anything, a community program might give you better clinical training than a research-oriented program...
Different people have different reasons. I initially couldn't understand why people rank WashU so low... I figured it might be because they didn't want a biologically-focused program, but they often rank UW or UCSD or Pitt above WashU (and if they didn't want a biological program, they wouldn't have interviewed at WashU). And I thought it might be because of the name (even though WashU is a name brand in the medical field, nobody else knows what it is), but then again, UW and UCSD and Pitt.
Then I realized it's probably just because of St. Louis. I think the same is probably true for MCW.