I was wondering what the norm is in PP regarding salary/benefits increases. Been with the same group for >2yrs, non partner, good track record, equal workload as those on partnership track. Stale contract at this point. How do I broach the subject?
I was wondering what the norm is in PP regarding salary/benefits increases. Been with the same group for >2yrs, non partner, good track record, equal workload as those on partnership track. Stale contract at this point. How do I broach the subject?
I asked one of my PP friends this very question at the ASA, as we get an adjustment (2-3%) every year, but go many years without adjusting the starting salary. It just went up a whipping $1000 BTW, though I think it is fair. His group evaluates the non partner track salary "every few years" and adjusts as necessary across the board. All non partners get paid the same, it doesn't matter if they're a new hire or 10 year veteran. The partner track people get killed with what I believe is an insane buy in. I would never do it, but the reward is a stable group in a reasonable location and 90+% income.
As stable as any PP group can be anyway.
HOLYS HIT.
That is downright stupid.
HOLYS HIT.
That is downright stupid.
I imagine going forward the only ones with an interest (or ability) in a buy in that steep will be hospitals, AMCs or some new ACO model.
HOLYS HIT.
That is downright stupid.
My buy in was over $1.5 million. I wouldn't recommend that course in this health care environment.
Here is the question blade. We know what your buy in was, but when you decide to leave how much is the buy out? IS it 1.5 million or more? it should be!!!
No, a buy in should be based on accounts receivable. As in you are buying into your future income that was generated by the partnership before you became partner. Your buyout should be based on the accounts receivable as well, as that is what you have already "earned" buy haven't been paid.
If a group is efficient in collections, their buy in/out should be relatively small. Our groups buyins have drastically shrank in size over the last 20 years because of improved collection efficiency (and per partner income up as well).
Here is the question blade. We know what your buy in was, but when you decide to leave how much is the buy out? IS it 1.5 million or more? it should be!!!
The crazy is is what if u don't make partner?
I have posted a few times that my sister got hosed on a 5 year partnership.
Well in excess of 1 million plus. Maybe closer to 1.5 million the more I think. Cause partners were making $450k- back than (late 90s-early 2000s) and make $500-600k these days.
And they were paying partnership track people 120,140,160,180, 200k.
And it wasn't her who didn't get partnership. Probably half of them or more didn't make partner.
Lesson learn. Make group pay your tail if you don't make partner. It's a red flag if group top cheap to pay ur tail if you don't become partner. Big red flag in my opinion.
Are you aware of people working buy outs in their contracts upon signing? Seems like that should be worked out. If you slave away in a three year partner track and decide to leave after a year seems like you should get some money upon your exit.
Out the name of the group!
Bunch of crooks
If groups were honest, "hey this isn't working out" after 1-2 years, it would be courtesy. Some groups in a 5 year partnership track do this for their partnership tracks and they pay their tail also.
My sister's current group which she is a partner does tell people by the 21st month whether they will be partner or not. They pay the tail for their employees if they don't become partner. They split the tail if employee leaves within 12 months. Very fair.
Anesthesiology is just another business. Buyer beware.
Honestly in this day and age, a 1-1.5 million dollar buy is probably a poor choice to make. There really isn't "stability" even in partnership groups these days with constant hospital negotiations every 2-3 years. Hospitals are leveraging management companies against local anesthesia groups. The fight can get very nasty unless all the partners of the local anesthesia group are in unison and 100% back each other to just "walk" from the contract.
Hospitals are counting on a lot of infighting with anesthesiologists who just want the status quo since they are nearing the end of their careers.
you will all have to forgive me for not having business sense in this post, my training excluded it. But lets say I start a job on a "partnership track". Lets just say partners in this particular practice make 500K, those on a partnership track make 250k for 4 years. After 4 years, I have essentially paid 1 million to become a partner. As far as I know, this is my "buy in" to the practice. So after 4 years, they say "Sorry Doc, its not going to work out", shouldnt I get that million back? I mean I was BUYING part of a practice. If you now are not going to give me what I paid for, arent I due a refund?
Agree. But ten years from now I would bet that some of the current desirable private practice partership jobs will still be desirable private practice jobs. Some currently desirable private practices will be acquired or dissolved. The former will be worth the steep buy in for new grads. The latter won't. There is no way to know which will make the cut. The risks have never been higher for a big buy in.
Thats the question I posed to blade. If there is a buy in? What is the buy out? No answer!!
II posed that question when i was inquiring about partnership positions. No answer. So i never took a partnership track position . No thanks. Pay me the market value, when im done with you i will leave.
When you start asking fiscally intelligent questions, they will no longer be interested. My advice is wait for them to make a job offer, then start asking nitty gritty questions
No. Buyout should be standard amongst partners. There is no buyout if you leave and aren't a partner and hadn't bought in. The buyin doesn't start until after you make partner.
I think my group is fair. Without specific numbers I got paid roughly 1/3 of what partners total pay was during my partnership track. Buyin ended up being half my partnership track salary. So in genertic terms...
Partnership track salary = 2X
Buyin = X
Partner salary = 6X
Your buy in does not compute. How many years were you in track?
Seems to me your buy in is 4x*track years. A sizable amount of money by my standards.
Or are you saying you took a crap salary for a few years and on top of that had to shell out half that salary to become partner? If so, you got royally screwed.
Thats the question I posed to blade. If there is a buy in? What is the buy out? No answer!!
🙄
II posed that question when i was inquiring about partnership positions. No answer. So i never took a partnership track position . No thanks. Pay me the market value, when im done with you i will leave.
When you start asking fiscally intelligent questions, they will no longer be interested. My advice is wait for them to make a job offer, then start asking nitty gritty questions
Your buy in does not compute. How many years were you in track?
Seems to me your buy in is 4x*track years. A sizable amount of money by my standards.
Or are you saying you took a crap salary for a few years and on top of that had to shell out half that salary to become partner? If so, you got royally screwed.
Look a his post again. Think "x" is about $125k. So, his salary was $250K for 3 years followed by a $125k "buy-in" after making partner. Then, partnership income is $730K or so plus benefits.
So, was his total buy in was over $1.3 million but look at the final salary.