I apologize for kicking this forum back into view. But I'm amazed at the responses this woman received in regards to the errors that were made by the pharmacy in regards to her medication. I mean seriously suck it up? You got your meds what's the problem? I'll tell you what the problem is. The problem is is that now that they have changed all the narcotic laws, this should be taken a lot more seriously than it is. They're making patients jump through hoops to get their medications. But the pharmacist can make a major mistake and it's just suck it up. This patient is has been on pain medications for a while. You don't seem to understand the difficulties that patients that are on pain medications go through. And as an advocate for pain patients I'm here to I'm here to tell all of you that this is a problem. It always gets blamed on the patient I understand that there are drug abusers regardless the patient should not be convicted when a thorough investigation hasn't been performed. I found this site exactly the same way my daughter was shorted 20 long acting dilaudid. She was also told she took too many she lost them it was her fault. 3 weeks later they gave her the prescription and said so sorry that we made a mistake. During those three weeks she went through great anxiety over how she was going to get through the rest of the month being shorted 20 dilaudid. If a patient stole 20 dilaudid they would be in jail. Yet you have the audacity to tell a legitimate patient with a legitimate error on the pharmacist part suck it up? I too am a pain patient and I had this happen to me also 20 years ago. Which they also found to have been a pharmacist error but because of the new laws that have been passed this time for the sake of my daughter and all chronic pain patients I am going to take this to the utmost highest level. I am a retired nurse and I find this to be horrifying that you would do this to a patient. Also I guess there's no drug addicts that are in the pharmacy business, because that would be impossible.
You've never worked behind the counter, you have no idea how many times per day this happens.
Wagrxm made a great point, and I believe this to be the crux of where the story crumbles, about how odd it was that the count was only #10 instead of #30, for the factors I am about to list:
-I'd estimate that > 75% of scripts (that are in pill-form), are written for a #30 count, making it very unlikely that the tech mis-read the count and filled for a different quantity.
-They are double-counted, but I've seen tech's circle and initial the count without actually doing it, it happens, you get busy, but I'd say it is unlikely they did this but for the following scenarios, let's assume they were lazy and just circled that it had been double-counted.
-If there were a deviation from the #30, it would've likely been 25(5 counts of 5),29(5 counts of 5 with a count of 4),31(5 counts of 5 with a count of 6), or 35 (7 counts of 5) count, again assuming the tech didn't actually double-count them.
-When the pharmacist received the basket from the tech to verify the prescription, it would've been hard not to recognize immediately that the weight of 10 tablets vs 30 tablets in a bottle, especially in something that is a decent-sized tablet like tylenol #4, was substantially lighter.
-The count was not different from what was expected when inventory occurred.
-Even if the pharmacist hadn't noticed the weight difference, the tech didn't double count, and the tech mis-read the script for only 10 tablets instead of thirty, the pharmacist would've caught the mistake when she opened the bottle to ensure the correct medication was filled.
Case dismissed. Next time fill at Walgreens, where our policy is to never double-count CIII-V, and always replenish the difference in what the customer claims was missing...True story.