- Joined
- Jan 5, 2014
- Messages
- 49
- Reaction score
- 5
Post removed by OP
Last edited:
Keeping it honest: you sound like a quack waiting to happen. It would be a waste of time training you in medical science just to go on and practice unproven therapies, but hey, some schools want diversity so who knows.
I didn't see your OP, but I strongly advise you to avoid in any way presenting an opinion positive toward any alternative therapies that are impossible to reconcile with the known laws of physics, chemistry, and biology. I would personally vote to reject an applicant who, say, was a practitioner of reiki, believed that water molecules have memory even when there is no active substance present, or claimed that acupuncture meridians really exist. I'll grant that learning about CAM is helpful because so many patients believe in it, and knowledge of CAM is helpful to be able to counsel patients about it. But in the sense that there is no proof for most alternative therapies beyond a hodgepodge of anecdotes, just about *all* of them are "wrong."
Nobody is going to care about how I found out about light therapy an whatever supplements to help me out of depression. They are going to care about my experience around people who have much worse problems than I did and learning things I don't even know I will learn yet right now.