• Bring your 2026 application questions to our open office hours with Emil Chuck, PhD, Director of Advising Services for HPSA, and get them answered live. Personal statements, secondaries, interview prep, school list strategy. Sunday, May 17 at 9 p.m. Eastern.

Quick question re: Berkeley Extension professors

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

LondonBear

New Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
First, sorry, this question is awfully specific, so it's not going to help 99.9% of the people here.

I've searched old SDN posts as well as RateMyProfessors, so I've definitely done as much research as I can. There's very limited amount of info, which is why I'm here.

I've been out of college for many years, so I need a fresh science LOR. I've missed most of the classes' enrollment deadlines, and my current two options are:
1. Ochem I with Richard Samuelson, or
2. Virology with Aung Chein

I can take either class. In terms of PROs, Ochem I has the advantage of being aligned with my MCAT studying, but I'd have to travel a bit to get to the Berkeley campus (plus the cost of gas and bridge toll). Virology's advantage is the fact that I live right next to the SF campus, it's a 2 minute walk.

My main priority is getting a strong LOR. To that end, my top priority is a prof who's nice and eager to help students succeed. Whether the class is engaging, commute time, etc all take a backseat. I'll take a strong letter written by a not-famous person over a bland one by a Nobel prize winner (an exaggeration, but you get what I mean). A great prof who's super busy can actually be a con, due to them not having the time to get to know you. To that end, my personality is also not sparkling; I'm not a suave social butterfly, so I probably can't stand out among a sea of students.

All that to ask those who have had either prof: do you think they're great for LOR writing? Thanks for any input!