-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
What's tougher on a patient? Having to travel 1 hour (or more) each way for 5 treatments or 10 minutes each way for 16 treatments?
These are not easy questions to answer for these isoeffective treatments, but if the smaller centers can't keep the lights on, they become very relevant.
These are not easy questions to answer for these isoeffective treatments, but if the smaller centers can't keep the lights on, they become very relevant.
you mean the australian trial, which also showed a trend toward a 3% difference in LR (neither powered to detect this size difference)? There have been no short course vs long course definitive comparisons. This trend of which I speak is in the context of a lower dose of RT in the long course arm than anyone gives inthe real-world when NOM is the intent. I'm not sure how it's reasonable to extrapolate from trials investigating neoadjuvant treatment and single arm trials that focus on those who got a cCR in the first place (the sometimes it works arm) to make decisions about the most efficacious approach to treating gross disease definitively from the outset. I trained at a place that use short-course pre-op and long course definitively, so I'm cool with both.
D
deleted1111261
Got it! Makes sense.
Just like the more socialist places are biased against longer courses, I think we do have some bias against shorter. Again - hard to be objective when literally we get punished for doing short courses. System is set up in such a way that it’s hard to make progress. At the same time, running short vs long studies seems like a really dumb study most of the time… but once the data is out, what do you do?
Last edited by a moderator:
I've had a few make it out a few years with chemo rads, never to 5 though. Not sure how long they would have made it with just chemo alone....
One of the ways that radonc is trained better. Presenting cost/benefit in somewhat quantitative terms and encouraging mutual decision making. This is particularly important with the type of patients that you see in the community (which are not always very representative of US clinical trial patients). Radiation oncologists routinely do this. For some reason, medical oncologists do not.
Existential threats all around. The last consideration that any of the initiatives in oncology have had is the health of the community radiation oncology work force. Again, I'm OK with academic radonc taking the talent from the last 15 years and finding a way to shrink the field and the time commitment of clinical radonc care over the next 25 years to the point where it fits into the pocket of medical oncology.
If.....they don't accept a single resident ever again. (There is no need to, these are docs that are actually between 30 and 50 years old today!)
RAPIDO was an unbalanced trial with much less systemic therapy given in the SOC arm, yet LC still "favored" long course. I'll see what I want to see 😉
That was always my thing with this trial. RAPIDO was a trial of early chemo vs +/- post-op chemo (>50% didn't get multiagent chemo). I'm not sure why broad conclusions on the radiation schema were inferred.
D
deleted1111261
That’s a good point.
Who's this kj glinrow idiot?
Or these guys
Now Offering Telehealth Appointments | Greater Houston Radiation Oncology: Radiation Oncologists: North Houston, South Houston & Huntsville, TX
Now offering virtual visits - Book online today! Trusted Radiation Oncologists serving North Houston, South Houston & Huntsville, TX. Visit our website to book an appointment online: Greater Houston Radiation Oncology
TBH though neither has posted jobs in a few years. They don't sound like the typical churn and burn type places based on that
I start it on first day of treatment 300 x 3 by the third day, and then if no side effects 600 x 3 by week 2
She's probably talking about TOPA in Austin. Looks like she's at Austin Cancer Centers. For what it is worth, I had a friend fly down there to interview years ago and was told that they paid straight salary, with no bonus structure. I can't remember the exact number, but I don't recall it being a lot (maybe 280K?). I remember them saying that they had plenty of people knocking on their doors since it was Austin, but judging from their website, they look like they have not hired a new-ish grad in years.
what is your taper up schedule? I find it challenging when it is too complicated. do you just go from 300 x 3 up to 600 x3?
I generally increase it only after 2-3 weeks, but still I find that even if you reach the desired dose it still takes some time for the actual effect of the treatment to kick in.
Penn has some papers on this. 300 x 1 first day, 300 x 2 second , 300 x 3 third. If not having any issues after a week, taper up to 600 x 3 over days. Almost all issues I see with neurontin are when starting medication- sleepiness dizziness. If only issue is sleepiness, then 300s during day and 600 at night. In UPenn experience, they were giving 1800-3000/day
have you guys ever been on linkedin? all of our compatriots in non-medicine fields - their entire job title and page is full of buzzword titles. I have no problem if docs want to participate too.
same as when I call myself the medical director of my two person site
medical director one of the most meaningless titles in rad onc, but we all use it
same as when I call myself the medical director of my two person site
medical director one of the most meaningless titles in rad onc, but we all use it
KO back at it again
Sounds like the steady state is finding them, not the other way around
Imagine trying to recruit URMs to keep your slots filled. More embarrassing!
The gaslighting on twitter over how it's wonderful that RO is now a less competitive specialty is really something. It's like when a CEO gets fired from a job and in news interviews he's like "It's actually great that they fired me... I now have time to do all the important things in life and hang out with my family."
KO is just such a "which way is the wind blowing today" type of "leader". He has a long history of this documented on this thread going back for years. Today he wants a reasonable/balanced number of quality candidates. FWIW Mayo hasn't decreased resident numbers at any of its three programs.
He's the Brick Tamland "I love lamp" of Radiation Oncology.
It's amazing that it is only now that they claim they want compassionate physicians and in the recent past, women and minorities, as if we never needed them before. There are a lot of great, smart, hardworking, compassionate doctors and soon-to-be doctors out there, many of which we work with or we see for our own care.
What I tell a medical student who is looking at our field, who appears to be a solid and good person, is that you can be a good doctor in any specialty because your future patients will need it. It is everything else that affects the specialty that you will have to live with.
I get what you're saying, and sometimes MROGA and lemmiwinks can go overboard. Their tactics of basically finding every pro-RadOnc thread and hitting it with napalm isn't what I would do, but it has been effective in terms of quieting down the sycophantic rhetoric on Twitter.
However, though applications from medical students have plummeted...what has changed, exactly? Virtually no programs have cut spots. The mismatch between available slots and number of applicants - which should be how the market corrects itself - is being artificially greased by programs taking people from either the SOAP or outside the Match. The core issue of oversupply isn't being addressed, but reimbursement cuts and the decreased utilization of radiation therapy continues on, unhindered.
I remain pessimistic that programs will cut spots in any meaningful way, even with all the turmoil going on in Radiation Oncology right now. But there is some hope for change, as long as the conversation (or flame throwing) continues. If we stopped talking about this, if MROGA and lemmiwinks left Twitter, if SDN shut down - what do you think would happen?
It's pretty obvious. The monetary incentive for academic institutions is to have as many residents as possible. There are FAR more Dennis Hallahans in this specialty than there are Brian Kavanaghs. Chairs will do what they perceive as best for them and their departments, even though it is a detriment to the specialty as a whole. The term "oversupply" would be swept under the rug and there would be absolutely no hope for contraction.
The refrain of "just don't soap and it will all work out" is so ludicrously misguided for all the above reasons. Yes apps have plummeted, a symptom of our specialty's increasingly unbearable stench, but when it all shakes out, what has changed in terms of pumping out rad oncs? Nothing
at least the US med students are evaluating the future and choosing against rad onc. That is a plus - we are wasting less human capital on this field
The chairs are never going to shrink spots. They care about their budget and retirement accounts more than the next generation of rad oncs. People like Olivier exist to cheer them on and continue the charade for their own benefit until the game stops.
And the game is stopping, please join my “fellowship”.
college.mayo.edu
The chairs are never going to shrink spots. They care about their budget and retirement accounts more than the next generation of rad oncs. People like Olivier exist to cheer them on and continue the charade for their own benefit until the game stops.
And the game is stopping, please join my “fellowship”.
Advanced Radiation Oncology Fellowship (Minnesota) - Residencies and Fellowships - Mayo Clinic College of Medicine & Science
Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education offers the Advanced Radiation Oncology Fellowship in Rochester, Minnesota.
college.mayo.edu
Academic twitter rad onc running a contest on who can make the stupidest post
D
deleted1111261
There is a really fun sock puppet account on Twitter that is trying to make friends and influence people! Give her a follow! Go Buckeyes!
Fasten your seatbelts. It’s going to be a bumpy night!
Looks like she set her account to private lol. Guess the doxxing hit too close to home
Last edited:
