I think we should cut some of these guys a break for occasional blups. Sue yom and bk are good “guys”. Some of the few in leadership who are actually trying to improve this specialty. Would be in a far better place if the rest of radonc emulated them.
Agree… no “-ism” accusations warranted. On the other hand, Shah should take a deep breath. It’s clear that the changes he proposes are difficult to implement and require restructuring the entire business model. Dr. Yom can’t just agree to them without first crunching some numbers… even if she agrees with them in principle. While I did not sense any sexism in their debate, I did sense that one party is looking to move on to other things, while the other will not let go. Author fees suck… but don’t quite warrant cornering someone who isn’t interested in arguing.
Who hasn’t been wrong or said something they regretted.
She said she didn't have time for this any more and Chirag stopped. Then, she re-started. I don't think what you're saying reflects the reality of the interaction.
How often do I f*ck up? Like every day a million times. And, what do I do? I reach out. I send a text or DM and I apologize. I do it on here, too, because I regret being antagonistic. BK didn't take the time to message Chirag or give him a call. He quote-tweeted in a very aggressive manner and called him a sexist. Does he think he is wrong or regrets it? What makes you think he does? I don't see any signs of that.
He’s got “I am for the current thing” down pat
Otoh now that they seem full woke can I spare myself a lot of useless arguments with “our leaders” if I start identifying as female
I admit the timeline it’s a little confusing, but I didn’t really see much of a breaking point. Perhaps some “let’s agree to disagree, but here is why you are wrong” type stuff.
Looked up California faculty salaries several years ago : sue yom was making half (500k? Which sucks in sf) what some of the other UC (worthless) chairmen like Mikey Steinberg were grifting. My guess is that red journal editor involves an enormous amt of work with almost no compensation and may be easy to personalize criticism. As chairwoman of one of the best programs, it’s not like she needs it to build her cv.
DUDE. yes, what is the matter with that?
I think it has something to do with clearing the history in chrome as it doesn't happen in IE. This I was told by someone from ASTRO.
My issue is that it keeps on trying to link my account to some other phantom elsevier account but it never works... the whole thing makes it take like 10 minutes to log on. Super frustrating.
Different Asian woman is chair
metro.co.uk
Yes, also happens to me occasionally. I thought I was the only one.
Live your truth Wallnerus.
Twitter gives everyone the illusion that the world would be barren without know their each and every thought. I really hope the pendulum starts careening back toward sanity soon
