Rad Onc Twitter

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted1002574
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
doesn’t spratt push protons ?
1745850210040.png

1745850250702.png

1745850406406.png

1745850487199.png

I would say, he likes protons.
But not for prostate.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I love to poke fun as much as the next guy, especially to deflate hypocrisy or pomposity. But my dad used to start meetings sometimes with “one of these days we all need to get together and be honest.” Whenever we use IMRT (a “device” I’d argue, as would CPT 77338) for prostate cancer, and I bet we all use IMRT 100 percent of the time, what is the level one evidence that it is superior to non IMRT methods.
Fair but look at the financial delta between IMRT and 3d. Protons vs IMRT far greater with no evidence to support superiority
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
Dan is probably charging most insurances 5-10x cms rates and has satellites throughout the metro. He is playing the same game. Its ok to charge prices 10x that of a small community hospital for same services, but somehow problematic to hype a shiny new robot.
 
Last edited:
Dan is probably charging most insurances 5-10x cms rates and has satellites throughout the metro. He is playing the same game. Its ok to charge prices 10x that of a small community hospital for same services, but somehow problematic to hype a shiny new robot.

‘dan’ as if he has anything to do with that let’s be real
 

Med school boom? I'm not sure what that was, or when. It looks like we graduate <30,000 MDs and DOs yearly in the US. I'm all for emphasizing that medicine is not what you think or hope it might be but having 2+ times as many applicants as spots only seems like those dreams that were unrealistic in the first place might be over. Maybe my math is wrong/I'm missing something.
 
Med school boom? I'm not sure what that was, or when. It looks like we graduate <30,000 MDs and DOs yearly in the US. I'm all for emphasizing that medicine is not what you think or hope it might be but having 2+ times as many applicants as spots only seems like those dreams that were unrealistic in the first place might be over. Maybe my math is wrong/I'm missing something.
Half of applicants are getting in. I thought it used to be 1/4th?
 
Top