Yeah good luck with this merger. I don't think I can think of any specialties which have merged in the recorded history of medicine, although there may be some. What happens instead is things keep branching off. And now we have specialties that would have been unthinkable 50 years ago. PM&R? Med-Peds? No way Osler could have comprehended that. Radiology and pathology are not going to merge in the near future. Pathology is no closer to disappearing than any other field is. I would think radiology is the closest to disappearing anyway - with the advent of digital images every doc can look up their own films and interpret them on their own. But have radiologists gone away? No, they are proliferating! And wouldn't you think that computer-assisted diagnosis would be much more of a threat in radiology that in pathology? Pathology images are thousands of times more complex and detailed than radiology images, yet the sky-is-falling crowd on these forums would have you believe that pathology is more threatened.
Look - technology is changing medicine. We all have to be prepared. But being prepared does not mean entrenching yourself and fighting off all comers. It means being familiar with things, up on technological advances, and being among the first to integrate important tasks.
If pathology is replaced by full body high-capability imaging systems then why the hell would radiologists need to exist either? I swear, people on these forums are a little thick sometimes. It's like you try to have your paranoia just the way you want it.
I tell you what though - when doctors are replaced by robots and computers the first that are going to be up against the wall are the luddites and the paranoid.