Tharp et al, JACR 2021
2019, 2020, and 2021 Cleveland Steamered this 2015 articleDon't forget about this lovely article:
Target tumors, not yourself: A review of False Claims Act allegations against radiation oncologists
Did I just 💩 on this party?
To be clear, cms is very clear that radonc does not have to be present in hospital or outpatient facility presently.Don't forget about this lovely article:
Target tumors, not yourself: A review of False Claims Act allegations against radiation oncologists
Did I just 💩 on this party?
Astro is not the government and the language is unequivocal. Astros position is basically that cms and the government are lying, and tying to entrap radoncs which is absurd.I agree, but that’s not ASTRO’s interpretation
Not entirely absurd. CMS makes decisions about what is or is not billable (i.e. simulations with IMRT), then claims it was always that way, and then wants “their” money back. Or they go ahead and pay for services (i.e. IMRT for breast cancer) which they then say are unnecessary, and then they want their money back. That being said, if they are explicit about supervision, I cannot see them backtracking on that and asking for “their” money back. But they are a bit like a medieval lord - so who knows.Astro is not the government and the language is unequivocal. Astros position is basically that cms and the government are lying, and tying to entrap radoncs which is absurd.