- Joined
- Jun 21, 2005
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm currently finishing up my MS3 year and have mostly narrowed my choices to rads vs cards with likely goals of doing interventional subspecialities (IR, IC, or EP).
My situation: MS3 at top 20 MD program in california, 250+ on step 1, honors in 60-70% of preclinical and honors or near honors so far on my rotations. some engineering/orthopedic research for a summer which is currently on hold, resulted in a poster presentation. I feel like I could excel in either field, both personally and from feedback I have gotten from attendings. I have a background in engineering, which is something I'd like to put to use. With cardio, there are stents, fluid mechanics, possible research in stem cells. I don't need to tell you about rads.
So I have looked into some old posts here and over at the cardiology forum, and have gotten some answers about this decision, but it usually degenerates into turf wars, whether they are real or not, "my grades are too good for IM" vs. "I can do your job just as well as you can, plus I'll do something about it", etc. Anyone here have a similar background in engineering who might be able to provide some insight regarding this issue? Some of the other specialties I've liked include CT surg, urology, vascular (endovascular, mostly), pulmonary/crit care, renal (mostly for the thinking)
Some pros/cons that I consider, personally, include the following (in order of importance). I don't believe that IR, diagnostics, cards, or IC are going to go out of business while I am practicing, nor do I worry about starving.
1. intellectual interest. actually I might favor rads here, since cards is pretty limited in terms of scope. EP is pretty interesting, though, and I love almost anything I do with the heart (peds cardio, CT surg). I enjoy the diagnostic aspect of medicine, but so much of it now just comes down to a hunch, and wait for imaging/labs.
2. lifestyle. obviously, cards is generally not as good, though IR I've heard can get pretty busy
3. patient contact. I enjoy talking to patients and hearing their stories, but only to a certain extent. I can still get pretty fed up with patients (waiting for placement etc), and it wasn't so bad on CT surg when I barely knew my patients but felt like we did so much for them.
4. fall-backs. if I go into rads, I can still have a pretty good life reading films even if I don't end up going into IR. cards still requires a fellowship, then another IC/EP on top of that. I don't see that much more in IM that I would do (though there are more options than gen surg).
5. the match. i think I have a very good chance of matching into a very good IM program in california, which would be my preference (though this is a little up in the air). i feel I probably have to be more open to moving if I do rads.
Thanks for any help you can provide. I continue to talk with attendings and residents but obviously everyone has their biases. My faculty adviser was of no help (well, in this specific question - cardio was the last thing he ruled out before choosing IR). I guess a lot of biased information is better than no information at all.
Also, if anyone has any suggestions on 4th year (planning on IM sub-I, some rads/IR rotations, maybe cards/IC as well) it would be greatly appreciated. Anyone know of a good away rotation in new york or boston?
My situation: MS3 at top 20 MD program in california, 250+ on step 1, honors in 60-70% of preclinical and honors or near honors so far on my rotations. some engineering/orthopedic research for a summer which is currently on hold, resulted in a poster presentation. I feel like I could excel in either field, both personally and from feedback I have gotten from attendings. I have a background in engineering, which is something I'd like to put to use. With cardio, there are stents, fluid mechanics, possible research in stem cells. I don't need to tell you about rads.
So I have looked into some old posts here and over at the cardiology forum, and have gotten some answers about this decision, but it usually degenerates into turf wars, whether they are real or not, "my grades are too good for IM" vs. "I can do your job just as well as you can, plus I'll do something about it", etc. Anyone here have a similar background in engineering who might be able to provide some insight regarding this issue? Some of the other specialties I've liked include CT surg, urology, vascular (endovascular, mostly), pulmonary/crit care, renal (mostly for the thinking)
Some pros/cons that I consider, personally, include the following (in order of importance). I don't believe that IR, diagnostics, cards, or IC are going to go out of business while I am practicing, nor do I worry about starving.
1. intellectual interest. actually I might favor rads here, since cards is pretty limited in terms of scope. EP is pretty interesting, though, and I love almost anything I do with the heart (peds cardio, CT surg). I enjoy the diagnostic aspect of medicine, but so much of it now just comes down to a hunch, and wait for imaging/labs.
2. lifestyle. obviously, cards is generally not as good, though IR I've heard can get pretty busy
3. patient contact. I enjoy talking to patients and hearing their stories, but only to a certain extent. I can still get pretty fed up with patients (waiting for placement etc), and it wasn't so bad on CT surg when I barely knew my patients but felt like we did so much for them.
4. fall-backs. if I go into rads, I can still have a pretty good life reading films even if I don't end up going into IR. cards still requires a fellowship, then another IC/EP on top of that. I don't see that much more in IM that I would do (though there are more options than gen surg).
5. the match. i think I have a very good chance of matching into a very good IM program in california, which would be my preference (though this is a little up in the air). i feel I probably have to be more open to moving if I do rads.
Thanks for any help you can provide. I continue to talk with attendings and residents but obviously everyone has their biases. My faculty adviser was of no help (well, in this specific question - cardio was the last thing he ruled out before choosing IR). I guess a lot of biased information is better than no information at all.
Also, if anyone has any suggestions on 4th year (planning on IM sub-I, some rads/IR rotations, maybe cards/IC as well) it would be greatly appreciated. Anyone know of a good away rotation in new york or boston?