• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Site Updates Coming Soon

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Rads vs Ophth

Rajshah

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Dec 14, 2003
38
0
0
I believe that Ophthalmology and Radiology are the two best specialities. Between the two I have been told that Rads wins as Ophth is getting oversupplied and I have been told that Rads earn far more than Ophth.
I've probably posted this in a biased forum which will support Rads.
Would be interested in your opinions
 
Upvote 0

Goober

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Nov 28, 2003
427
1
201
  1. Attending Physician
How do you define the best specialty?

Rads do not earn far more the ophth. Where did you get this information? Rads and Ophth average pretty close, but I think the potential for really big bucks is higher in Ophth. It is much easier to open a solo practice in ophth than rads.

Rads is in demand right now but just 5-7 years ago it was very difficult to get a job. Everything goes in cycles.
 
Upvote 0
About the Ads

Rajshah

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Dec 14, 2003
38
0
0
Thanks for input.
Is it true that Ophth is getting oversupplied?
And about tele-rads I thought they were frowned on by the rest of the radiology community.
I have to say I am currently thinking of doing Rads, but I am worried that after training there may be a shortage of jobs due to tele radiology
 
Upvote 0

Santiago

Catheter Jockey
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 23, 2003
252
0
0
Neverland
hi Raj,
There's nothing common in both the fields except for the money and a bit of lifestyle.Go for what you love rather than how much money is in that speciality.Your love for the field would stick u through thick and thin unlike all the peripherals associated with the speciality.The decision shouldn't be that tough.
All the best.
 
Upvote 0

Santiago

Catheter Jockey
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 23, 2003
252
0
0
Neverland
Originally posted by Dr. Cuts
You can't do tela-ophtho now can you? ;) If the thought of working out of home or being free to travel and live wherever you want is appealing to you -- like it is to me -- then Rads is the clear winner...


hey Cuts..

What's with the new avatar..???
Can't seem to crack it?Is the guy nighthawking? :confused:
 
Upvote 0

Goober

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Nov 28, 2003
427
1
201
  1. Attending Physician
Originally posted by Dr. Cuts
You can't do tela-ophtho now can you? ;) If the thought of working out of home or being free to travel and live wherever you want is appealing to you -- like it is to me -- then Rads is the clear winner...

I hope you live the dream Cuts.

Unfortunately you will find that after you actually do some radiology, doing teleradiology nighthawk work is not all that it is cracked up to be.

Probably >98% of radiologists are not doing teleradiology nighthawk as their primary job even though almost all them could if they chose to do so. If it were such a great gig why aren't people signing up left and right?

I'll tell you why-

1. Unless you are set on living in a foreign country half way around the world, it is not a long term job. Even if you are set on living in a foreign country it is not secure job unless you set up the company yourself and you have the contracts. When the market tanks as it will inevitably, you are job is either going to India or you will lose it to somebody who will work for half as much as you or you will take a huge pay cut. At that time you will wish you were a partner in some group.

2. If somebody is going to pay you 400k, you are going to do 400k worth of work (ie you are going to work you arse off). The biggest lesson people coming of training have to learn (and I had to learn it myself) is that you are not worth nearly as much as you think you are.

3. The work itself is not satisfying. You have no control over anything sent to you from a quality standpoint.
Every time the primary group reads your report and doesn't like it, you are going to hear about it. Nighthawk work is all about the numbers and productivity. You may find that being a radiology robot is not that exciting.

4. If you are getting your information from recruiters, you will soon learn that recruiters are not your friend. They only care about placing you in a job so they can get their big paycheck and couldn't care less if you actually like the job or are a good fit for it. They throw around all kinds of huge numbers and incredible benefits when talking to you. Basically they stretch the truth and hide all the bad stuff. It is easy to get taken in by them at first until you realize that most of their jobs suck. The best jobs are filled by word of mouth and the best groups don't use recruiters because they don't have to. Most of the jobs that recruiters have basically are available because nobody will take the position (and often for very good reason)

5. Of the 4 radiologists I know who did telerad nighthawk jobs, only one lasted more than year. Who knows maybe it will work for you, but I would be willing to wager that 10 years from now you will not be doing a teleradiology nighthawk job
:cool:
 
Upvote 0

Santiago

Catheter Jockey
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 23, 2003
252
0
0
Neverland
Originally posted by Goober
I hope you live the dream Cuts.

Unfortunately you will find that after you actually do some radiology, doing teleradiology nighthawk work is not all that it is cracked up to be.

Probably >98% of radiologists are not doing teleradiology nighthawk as their primary job even though almost all them could if they chose to do so. If it were such a great gig why aren't people signing up left and right?

I'll tell you why-

1. Unless you are set on living in a foreign country half way around the world, it is not a long term job. Even if you are set on living in a foreign country it is not secure job unless you set up the company yourself and you have the contracts. When the market tanks as it will inevitably, you are job is either going to India or you will lose it to somebody who will work for half as much as you or you will take a huge pay cut. At that time you will wish you were a partner in some group.

2. If somebody is going to pay you 400k, you are going to do 400k worth of work (ie you are going to work you arse off). The biggest lesson people coming of training have to learn (and I had to learn it myself) is that you are not worth nearly as much as you think you are.

3. The work itself is not satisfying. You have no control over anything sent to you from a quality standpoint.
Every time the primary group reads your report and doesn't like it, you are going to hear about it. Nighthawk work is all about the numbers and productivity. You may find that being a radiology robot is not that exciting.

4. If you are getting your information from recruiters, you will soon learn that recruiters are not your friend. They only care about placing you in a job so they can get their big paycheck and couldn't care less if you actually like the job or are a good fit for it. They throw around all kinds of huge numbers and incredible benefits when talking to you. Basically they stretch the truth and hide all the bad stuff. It is easy to get taken in by them at first until you realize that most of their jobs suck. The best jobs are filled by word of mouth and the best groups don't use recruiters because they don't have to. Most of the jobs that recruiters have basically are available because nobody will take the position (and often for very good reason)

5. Of the 4 radiologists I know who did telerad nighthawk jobs, only one lasted more than year. Who knows maybe it will work for you, but I would be willing to wager that 10 years from now you will not be doing a teleradiology nighthawk job
:cool:


Very well said.The third point you have raised is very pertinent.The only telerad guy I know has said plenty a time ..if only he could get some more sequences done,maybe do an usg to correlate his findings.Acc to him,telerads has its advantages but can't compare to on the spot reporting.Sometimes its very frustrating.
 
Upvote 0
About the Ads
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.