Random non-MCAT and only peripherally related to the MCAT thread - Part 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted106503
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

deleted106503

A few ground rules. Everything you post must be RANDOM and more importantly, only peripherally related to the MCAT. See my example post below. I now await Beary's shirtless pic of Carl Edwards. C'mon Beary, A-man is dying to see it. 😀

This is Ana's example:

vin_diesel.jpg


My, factually, better examples 😀 :

5482354yw2.jpg


1151166401169co4.jpg


aro2.jpg


And one final thing. GO GATORS! GO AGGIES! My parents are A&M alum...

Random Part 6 Tally said:
WilliamsF1 1,307
Nikki2002 991
Arsenic 852
jlw9698 703
Anastasis 691
beary 689
RAD11 512
Dr Durden 443
oxeye 424
BrettBatchelor 396
Teerawit 392
mshheaddoc 378
megboo 258
lilithny 255
MollyMalone 229
scentimint 219
UMP 203
TypeA 201
Crazy Canuck 190
QofQuimica 144
ironmanf14 121
EvoDevo 109
Tanner82 98
supernova33418 70
gujuDoc 45
ChymeChancellor 22
DRKUBA 20
Dr. Pepper 14
Cozmosis 12
Pemberley 3
abadri421 3
ylitia 2
da_donut 2
Bismuth 2
tik-tik-clock 1
spicedmanna 1
RPedigo 1
predoc07 1
waterski.232002 1
Noeljan 1
docolive 1
PWH 1
 
:laugh: UMP, priests should not be raping little boys. I don't know how you can even begin to use the "they are human" argument with that. Priests are people that, while having the same flaws as any human being, SHOULD be held to higher standards. I mean, these are people preaching about our "sins" right? It's simply a flaw in the church, that's all i'm saying.

We had one of those bastards at my church. He actually had the nerve to preach/condemn homosexuality; it was like his little mini crusade within our chruch. He is now in Jail for child molestation charges. What a joke. Maybe thats why i'm so jaded to the whole religion thing. They all have flaws and no one is better or "right" in my opinion.

i know of a musician who rapes little boys, too... I'm jaded about music now, also
 
And an entire religious organization sanctioning the cover-up and hush-hush attitude of individual mens' actions chafes me. Enough that after Christmas dinner last year, when my very "Catholic", conservative Republican extended family members decided to talk about the current scandals and how these adults just "made up" allegations 15, 20 years later, they got to hear a 20 minute speech from me on the psychological impact of molestation by a supposed pillar of the community, the shame and depression that goes along with it, and the continued psychological damage that's inflicted when an apology is not given and the victim is not allowed to work through the healing process.

Man I'm looking forward to the holidays this year.
Having a relative who was abused, I can say that some of the priest really might have f'd up some peoples lives ...

Not to bring it back political but conservatives have more sex than liberals. Random fact of the day.
:idea: Interesting .... can I have the source of this 😀


I agree. Also, the number of priests that have molested children is far outshadowed by the number of priests who have not. We just hear about the bad ones because it's news.

Catholicism is one of the hardest Christian denominations to follow IMO. There are many rules outside the Bible, but the rules are based on scripture and biblical teachings (reconciliation, communion, confirmation, mass, etc.). I admit that I have not been diligent about going to mass, but I respect the religion immensely.
Guju brought up a good point which my husband argues with me. Catholics rely more on tradition then strict bible-teaching. Its completel different from some other Christian religions. But my own view about it (not to offend anyone) is that the bible is just another book that was probably "altered" to suit the needs of those who "created it". :meanie: CONSPIRACY THEORY! But seriously, its like every religion has its own bible. I'm not a fan of english and old english (I prefer pig latin) so maybe that is why I'm not huge about sitting there and reading it every week. I hated CCD.
 
:laugh: UMP, priests should not be raping little boys. I don't know how you can even begin to use the "they are human" argument with that. Priests are people that, while having the same flaws as any human being, SHOULD be held to higher standards. I mean, these are people preaching about our "sins" right? It's simply a flaw in the church, that's all i'm saying.
Its sad b/c there are many priests out there doing the "right" thing ... and its those few who have issues who have brought the rest of them down.

Why can't they just go back to the "nun" scandels 😉

I agree Fe ... priests should be held to higher standards.
 
But my own view about it (not to offend anyone) is that the bible is just another book that was probably "altered" to suit the needs of those who "created it". :meanie: CONSPIRACY THEORY! But seriously, its like every religion has its own bible. I'm not a fan of english so maybe that is why I'm not huge about sitting there and reading it every week. I hated CCD.

But seriously... religion and God were created to control the masses 👍
 
Honestly, I think my atheist ex-boyfriend had a point when he'd argue that. But without faith sometimes there isn't hope. I don't see religion as a bad thing but its an interesting perspective on history. Almost like evolutionary theory of religions ... but I believe there is some basis for the establishment of religion. Why I believe, I can't explain. Just like how I believe there are powers of the supernatural and we live in a 5D universe :meanie: 😀
 
But seriously... religion and God were created to control the masses 👍

This is one of the points I was trying to make. You can say all you want about different religions, but they are only effective when the social purposes of the masses are served by them. Those religions which are now relegated as mythology were once serving a purpose or article of faith with the people that believed them. However, when people started to see things happening that contradicted those beliefs they needed something else to turn to and that's when you started to see a lot of people turn to other religions.

When people take religious teachings out of context and as a literal meaning rather then trying to find the hidden morals behind the stories that's when problems arise.
 
Or what about why Hindu's don't eat meat??? Sure they have stories about why they don't do it, but historically speaking India was a country with a variety of vegetation that couldn't even be found in American farms so they probably came to make that the main staple of their diets. On the other hand, the countries in the northern parts of the world didn't have the right climates and so had to rely on things like meat.

Some Hindus are allowed to eat meat. No one is allowed to eat beef of course since the cow is sacred to them. According to some of my Indian friends, it goes back based on "rank" in society and given last name. You have the merchants in the society (usually last name Patel) who are not allowed to eat any meats. Then you have people higher up in the class "warriors" you are allowed to eat chicken. It goes up like that. One of my friends is Hindu and his family eats chicken (last name is not Patel). My other friend with the last name Patel doesn't give a **** and does whatever he wants. :laugh:
 
Some Hindus are allowed to eat meat. No one is allowed to eat beef of course since the cow is sacred to them. According to some of my Indian friends, it goes back based on "rank" in society and given last name. You have the merchants in the society (usually last name Patel) who are not allowed to eat any meats. Then you have people higher up in the class "warriors" you are allowed to eat chicken. It goes up like that. One of my friends is Hindu and his family eats chicken (last name is not Patel). My other friend with the last name Patel doesn't give a **** and does whatever he wants. :laugh:



Trust me if there's one thing I don't need an education on from a non hindu, it is my religion. But thanks.

I was just trying to show a point that many of the religious beliefs are probably due to the societal conditions around them more then the covenants they claim are the basis of those very rules.

And yes in the modern day and age there are many people that follow religion whether its hindu or christian or whatever so you'll find many Indians who do eat everything even if they are hindu. Since there's a big mixture of other religions in India there is beef in India and other meat as well. We have hindus, but then we have Christians and Muslims and Sikhs and Jains and Buddhists and pretty much many other religions.

Also it isn't as black and white with the whole caste system because differences in beliefs also exist based on the area you are from. The beliefs of a gujarati (Patels and shah and some others) and a South Indian are far different from each other. Even among south indo, malu vs. tamil vs. telugu vs. Kanada beliefs very although there are some similarities.

There are two main historical divisions: The dravidians and the arayans. the latter group were ancient Iranians that brought about the sanskrit based languages and many of the original Hindu beliefs in India. the former was the more ancient of the two groups that sorta migrated to the south parts of India so the beliefs in religion are like comparing different sects of christianity.

But again, I brought it up in my original example to show how environment and societal conditions could impact religion and how many beliefs probably come from the conditions in which society had to deal with.
 
Guju brought up a good point which my husband argues with me. Catholics rely more on tradition then strict bible-teaching. Its completel different from some other Christian religions. But my own view about it (not to offend anyone) is that the bible is just another book that was probably "altered" to suit the needs of those who "created it". :meanie: CONSPIRACY THEORY! But seriously, its like every religion has its own bible. I'm not a fan of english and old english (I prefer pig latin) so maybe that is why I'm not huge about sitting there and reading it every week. I hated CCD.


am I the only one who found the bolded part particularly funny? :laugh:
 
Is it horrible that I'm thinking about going to med school overseas?

my friend goes to SGU and she likes it there. I suppose it all depends on how you do on your usmle step 1 exam which will help in getting the residency of your dreams. Also, years down the road, a patient isnt going to ask you what med school you went to nor will your colleagues really care. The chief of medicine in the hospital I used to volunteer at went to med school in mexico so go figure.
 
MUSHY!!!!!!!!!!!
LIL!!!!!!!!! 😍 I still haven't seen pics from trip! 😡

Is it horrible that I'm thinking about going to med school overseas?
Not in the least. I wanted to go over the atlantic bridge program ... ireland specifically but got married and all. 🙄


am I the only one who found the bolded part particularly funny? :laugh:
:meanie: I think UMP didn't see it as I went back and edited it really quick. 😀

Ok off to pack and get to the airport! Talk to ya from jersey!!! 😍
 
Why overseas????

I'm going to take the multiple question marks as a negative response.

As for overseas, I like it there, it would be a nice change of pace... plus I'd be strengthening my comprehension of another language.

I know it would make things a big difficult when it comes to residency (step scores are important of course... but there are people out there who look down on foreign docs.... and I think they are insane), but this isn't set in stone. It's just a thought. I'm still applying here in the states, but I don't think it should be ruled out completely. And even though I respect DOs... I think I'd take a foreign MD over a US DO... my opinion, of course. And this could change. Who knows. I'm still estatic over my trip.
 
and... if you have a layover in Hong Kong, expect like four security checks before getting on the plane. And it appears that if you keep liquids and gels in little zip lock bags, you can bring them with you... but my little complementary toothbrush from the hotel with the micro tube of questionable paste is thrown out immediately
 
:laugh: I hope it's nothing serious... but your shift in ranting was very amusing

Heh, the itching was driving me nuts. I ate albacore tuna and shiitake mushrooms yesterday - those were the only things different in my diet so one of them made my body mad. Or something.

But back to Catholicism...If the church kept changing things based on popular trends, then the religion wouldn't be Catholicism any longer, it would be something else entirely. I wasn't around in the days of Christ, but the Catholic church (and the Orthodox churches as well) stemmed from those days. Catholic traditions have been in place since the earliest of days. It's the other denominations that have strayed (for whatever reason - not saying good or bad) from the line of Catholicism.

It is extremely unfortunate for our religion that there are those that use it to benefit themselves, e.g. pedophiles, money-hungry, power-hungry, etc. However, bashing the Catholic religion is fruitless because ALL religions have a history of people who have done wrong.

I don't think someone is going to hell because they don't follow the same traditions as me, i.e. they are Lutheran or Episcopalian or some other denomination. They just have other ways they feel are more appropriate to serve and worship God and Jesus. The worship of God and Jesus being the fundamental basis for Christianity. All the denominations are under the blanket of Christianity by holding to fundamental ideals.

So a priest molested or raped a boy. It's horrible. Absolutely horrible. Put him in jail. So there was a coverup. Hold those accountable who were responsible. But don't start telling me that the whole religion is bogus based on the actions of those people.

Lately there seems to be a rash of female high-school teachers taking advantage of boys in their classes. Does that mean I'm against female teachers in schools? No. There have been many reports of police brutality - are all policeman jerks? No.

Catholics do not rely on tradition more than strict Bible teaching. If you've ever experienced a Catholic mass, then you are well aware there are 4 readings directly from the Bible. First reading, second reading, psalm, and gospel. If you have a great priest, his homily should be to decipher the readings into lay terms and help apply them to daily life. If you go to mass every Sunday, then you are studying direct scripture 52 times a year (and Holidays), however some that are dedicated go to mass daily or more than once a week. Scripture is also the basis for consecrating the bread and wine into body and blood. I went to a catholic grade school (1-8) and jesuit high school and we had daily religion classes, all involving scripture.

I don't know why anyone would say Catholicism relies more on tradition than Bible. The Bible is the foundation for any tradition and a tool used every day. I may not go to mass regularly, but I have my Bible on my bedstand and read from it most nights before I go to bed. Maybe those who are disenchanted with their parish or priest should find a better one, or learn how to practice Catholicism outside of the actual church. It's not like you're only Catholic during mass.

Man, I'm itching again.... gotta find the benadryl....
 
Do any of you guys get that Super Channel tv thing? It's that religious channel. Apparently they're based in Orlando. They've been raising money for YEARS to build a high-rise religious building here. It looks 60% done. Since they couldn't raise all the money, it took longer than it should. Eventually, they ran out of money and a 15+ story building with only a concrete structure exposed stood. The City said they had to install windows to cover it up or else the City would take it and the land, lol. They had some crazy fundraising to do this and now every floor over the 3rd has windows. They have no more money. lol
 
Heh, the itching was driving me nuts. I ate albacore tuna and shiitake mushrooms yesterday - those were the only things different in my diet so one of them made my body mad. Or something.

But back to Catholicism...If the church kept changing things based on popular trends, then the religion wouldn't be Catholicism any longer, it would be something else entirely. I wasn't around in the days of Christ, but the Catholic church (and the Orthodox churches as well) stemmed from those days. Catholic traditions have been in place since the earliest of days. It's the other denominations that have strayed (for whatever reason - not saying good or bad) from the line of Catholicism.

It is extremely unfortunate for our religion that there are those that use it to benefit themselves, e.g. pedophiles, money-hungry, power-hungry, etc. However, bashing the Catholic religion is fruitless because ALL religions have a history of people who have done wrong.

I don't think someone is going to hell because they don't follow the same traditions as me, i.e. they are Lutheran or Episcopalian or some other denomination. They just have other ways they feel are more appropriate to serve and worship God and Jesus. The worship of God and Jesus being the fundamental basis for Christianity. All the denominations are under the blanket of Christianity by holding to fundamental ideals.

So a priest molested or raped a boy. It's horrible. Absolutely horrible. Put him in jail. So there was a coverup. Hold those accountable who were responsible. But don't start telling me that the whole religion is bogus based on the actions of those people.

Lately there seems to be a rash of female high-school teachers taking advantage of boys in their classes. Does that mean I'm against female teachers in schools? No. There have been many reports of police brutality - are all policeman jerks? No.

Catholics do not rely on tradition more than strict Bible teaching. If you've ever experienced a Catholic mass, then you are well aware there are 4 readings directly from the Bible. First reading, second reading, psalm, and gospel. If you have a great priest, his homily should be to decipher the readings into lay terms and help apply them to daily life. If you go to mass every Sunday, then you are studying direct scripture 52 times a year (and Holidays), however some that are dedicated go to mass daily or more than once a week. Scripture is also the basis for consecrating the bread and wine into body and blood. I went to a catholic grade school (1-8) and jesuit high school and we had daily religion classes, all involving scripture.

I don't know why anyone would say Catholicism relies more on tradition than Bible. The Bible is the foundation for any tradition and a tool used every day. I may not go to mass regularly, but I have my Bible on my bedstand and read from it most nights before I go to bed. Maybe those who are disenchanted with their parish or priest should find a better one, or learn how to practice Catholicism outside of the actual church. It's not like you're only Catholic during mass.

Man, I'm itching again.... gotta find the benadryl....

Orthodox churches split from Catholicism for political reasons... too. 😛

and all police officers are jerks.

and maybe we should put this topic to rest... 😕
 
Trust me if there's one thing I don't need an education on from a non hindu, it is my religion. But thanks.

I was just trying to show a point that many of the religious beliefs are probably due to the societal conditions around them more then the covenants they claim are the basis of those very rules.

And yes in the modern day and age there are many people that follow religion whether its hindu or christian or whatever so you'll find many Indians who do eat everything even if they are hindu. Since there's a big mixture of other religions in India there is beef in India and other meat as well. We have hindus, but then we have Christians and Muslims and Sikhs and Jains and Buddhists and pretty much many other religions.

Also it isn't as black and white with the whole caste system because differences in beliefs also exist based on the area you are from. The beliefs of a gujarati (Patels and shah and some others) and a South Indian are far different from each other. Even among south indo, malu vs. tamil vs. telugu vs. Kanada beliefs very although there are some similarities.

There are two main historical divisions: The dravidians and the arayans. the latter group were ancient Iranians that brought about the sanskrit based languages and many of the original Hindu beliefs in India. the former was the more ancient of the two groups that sorta migrated to the south parts of India so the beliefs in religion are like comparing different sects of christianity.

But again, I brought it up in my original example to show how environment and societal conditions could impact religion and how many beliefs probably come from the conditions in which society had to deal with.

I tried learning about the sects in Hinduism through Wikipedia one time... ran in to topics on racial divisions/language divisions/etc...

It's like telling all of Europe: you are one country... now move on.😕 Seems a bit too chaotic

And the whole Dravidian/Aryan thing is crazy too... I've heard of some of my Indian friends talking about how their parents want them to find a nice light skinned girl (but not white, obviously)
 
Top