- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm reviewing ochem right now and i feel silly for asking this but I cant make the conceptual leap between these terms.
For example, when describing cyclohexanes the chair conformations where the largest substituent are equitorial is the most favorable/stable conformations and also most reactive when compared to the axial positions.
I was under the assumption that the more reactive something is the less stable. I'm mixing up energetics with favorability and stability. What should I look at when deciding between two compounds reactivity? (Intermediates)
I hope that makes sense.
Thanks!
For example, when describing cyclohexanes the chair conformations where the largest substituent are equitorial is the most favorable/stable conformations and also most reactive when compared to the axial positions.
I was under the assumption that the more reactive something is the less stable. I'm mixing up energetics with favorability and stability. What should I look at when deciding between two compounds reactivity? (Intermediates)
I hope that makes sense.
Thanks!