To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?
To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?
I'll leave it to the adcoms to give a definitive answer, but I have never heard anyone say reapplicant status is a metric used in review priority, one way or the other. Your priority is whatever it would be otherwise. Being a reapplicant typically just involves having the jump through the additional hoop of having your application compared to a prior one, and typically needing to show material improvement to be considered.
To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?
To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?
To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?
I got dragged along by Toledo last cycle and got an II from them a few days ago. N=1 but I don't think being a reapplicant matters in order of priority.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.