- Joined
- Oct 19, 2006
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm having a tough time figuring why not go to Baylor's MSTP?
I think the only big detractor about Baylor is that there is some instability with them switching teaching hospitals and building their own.
I thought you get that kind of diversity at most places... off the top of my head, case western students can train at 3 (4?) different hospitals, univ. cincinnati students can train at 5-7 hospitals (VA, children's hospital, university hospital, christ (I think..), jewish (lol), and one more), dartmouth, university of washington.. hell, practically every school I interviewed at
Yup, that's the main drawback I saw. Finishing in 8 yrs at Baylor more or less means you finished up your PhD in the same amount of lab time as those that graduate in 7 yrs at more integrated programs.
Another point that makes Baylor different (not necessarily a good or bad thing) is that its a public/private school mix and as a result, the class is 70% from Texas. So its lacking in geographic diversity when compared to some other private schools.
Oh and Houston is humid.
seconded. Most places I visited had a variety of hospitals, public/private/govt/children's to choose from.
Anyway, perhaps we should just be calling this thread Baylor's distinguishing factors, because I'm not sure how I value-judge most of these things as reasons to go/not to go.
Might get a lot of heat for this, but I think it is very unwise to do 6 months of clinical rotations prior to starting the PhD. I still don't understand why programs do this as the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages in my mind. Maybe I would have a different opinion if my program was structured this way, but having gone through the whole process I think it is definitely a mistake.
I think the primary problem is simply logistics. I am not entirely sure how the program is structured, but from what is written here it sounds like once you come back from your PhD you do only one more year before graduating (2nd half of MS3 and MS4)? I wrote about this earlier in another thread, but trying to finish up required 3rd year clerkships (e.g. shelfs!), trying to narrow down a subspecialty choice by taking AIs/electives, and applying to residency programs/going on interviews (esp. if you are in competitive specialty and have to interview at tons of prelim and specialty programs) all in one year would simply be a huge nightmare (especially if your specialty is early match). If you already know what you want to do (e.g. Medicine) and you already did a rotation in medicine prior to your PhD, then that is all fine and well but what if you are unsure and need to do some electives to find out? Then there are annoying things like Step 2 CK/CS to get out of the way. Will program directors care that your clinical LORs are 5+ years old? It sounds like a miserable and hectic year, and in my opinion, the last thing you need before starting a brutal intern year.
Finally, I think it is very important that you do not discount the effect that 5 years off will have on your clinical skills (not that you have many to lose to begin with, but still). 5 years is a long long time. If you are trying to shine on an audition rotation right after you come back from the lab, it is simply going to be harder if you are competing with other 4th years who have just finished a whole year of MSIII and are clinically sharp. Not to say it can't be done, but it is a reality. I'm sure some MSTPers are clinical superstars who can remember after a 5 year layoff how to interpret a complicated ABG on rounds but if I was in that situation I would be lucky if I could remember what things I should add/subtract to figure out the anion gap.
On the one hand I see your point, but isn't "transitioning" between being a Clinician and an Scientist what being one is all about?there are enough transitions as is if you are going for a career as a physician scientist, one less transition between basic science and clinical medicine is appealing to me.
Can you clarify this statement? This wasn't my impression at all. As I understood, you pretty much started at after MS2 at the same point as an entering PhD student.
What is the primary reason for structuring it that way (6mo of clinic before PhD)? ... Personally I still rather prefer having all my clinical training stuck together in one big chunk (MS3/MS4, R1-3, then 1st year of fellowship) - there are enough transitions as is if you are going for a career as a physician scientist, one less transition between basic science and clinical medicine is appealing to me.