@Shotapp: I've taken no science or math courses, and I’m thinking in terms of career changer programs. I plugged things in for English class titles.
3 Fs, 1 D, 8 Cs, a couple of withdrawals, several incompletes, 1 B, 3B+s, 19 As+A-s. The GPA is a 2.8 something without re-takes/omissions.
@DrMidlife: This is specific and all makes sense. Thank you.
"Nobody in med school admissions cares which upper div English classes you took, other than being alarmed at the F's you got. Nobody is going to question whether upper div English replacement classes are actually equivalent or not. Generally I'd be annoyed as an app reviewer if I have to care about your upper div English more than very very briefly verifying your 2ry app explanation for bad grades"
Haha, I’d hope so, but I've lost the luxury of presumption.
Clarification: are strong grades in additional same-subject higher level or same-subject equivalent level (non-science) courses preferable to strong grades in equiv. or higher level courses in different (but still non-science) subjects?
Should someone who, pre-Waterloo, earned high grades in same-subject classes (at least comparable, in level, to subsequent C/D/F grade courses) take additional equiv. or higher level coursework in bombed subjects specifically rather than in at least comparable level courses in different humanities/social science subjects (e.g., in 13,' Eng 324: A, 14' Eng 342: F, 16' Hist 432: A v 13' Eng 324: A, 14' Eng 342: F, 16' F Eng 432/353, A)?