Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So after perusing the NRMP's Charting Outcomes pdf(1), I noticed the mean number of research experiences/abstracts/publications is listed for those who matched into each specialty. For the two specialities I currently have my eye on, IM and neurology, I see that the mean is >2. This seems to be the case for a lot of the other specialties I glanced at, with of course the more competitive specialties having higher avg research experiences. I'm not interested with making a career out of research, but these stats make me think a minimum amount of research is a necessary evil. Especially when trying to match into a decent program in an era of increasing class sizes and stagnant residency spots.
Is this actually the case? What exactly is a "research experience?" Since even the top DO research schools have pretty paltry research budgets compared to our allo counterparts, how do DO students get these research experiences? Barring any unforeseen circumstances, I'll be going to CCOM next year so any info specific to CCOM would be much obliged.
1. http://www.nrmp.org/data/chartingoutcomes2007.pdf
Is this actually the case? What exactly is a "research experience?" Since even the top DO research schools have pretty paltry research budgets compared to our allo counterparts, how do DO students get these research experiences? Barring any unforeseen circumstances, I'll be going to CCOM next year so any info specific to CCOM would be much obliged.
1. http://www.nrmp.org/data/chartingoutcomes2007.pdf