- Joined
- Aug 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,006
- Reaction score
- 2
So I'm a big geek and I ran some statistics on the residency director scores in the usnews rankings. I figure this will let me actually know what to do with that information. As a disclaimer, I got the numbers from an earlier thread here. It looks like they were research rankings. If anyone can give me the primary care rankings with residency director scores, I'll do those stats too.
I think it's important to note that usnews gave these surveys to "residency program directors in fields outside primary care, including surgery, psychiatry, and radiology."
Theoretically the score could take on values from 1.0 to 5.0. Compiling all the residency director scores for the 64 ranked schools gives the following statistics:
Min: 3.0
1st quartile: 3.3
Median: 3.6
3rd quartile: 4.0
Max: 4.8
Mean: 3.71
Standard Dev: 0.48
The distribution isn't normal (surprise)
There were 6 schools each with a score of 4.0, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.2.
Some comments...
Though the 3rd quartile is 4.0, there are 6 schools with a score of 4.0 and 4 schools with a score of 4.1, leaving only 11 to fill out the scores from 4.2 to 4.8. Notice the score difference between 1QR and the min is 0.3, between the median and 1QR is 0.3, between 3QR and the median is 0.4, and between the max and 3QR is 0.8. So the air gets pretty thin at the top.
Noting that 3.0 is the midway point in the theoretical scale, residency directors tend to think any top 64 school is at least midway between marginal (1.0) and exceptional (5.0).
No school got all residency directors to agree that it was exceptional (ie, no school got a 5 from everyone).
The top 31 schools (two were tied at 30) based on overall research ranking ranged from 3.5 to 4.8 on residency director score. The next 33 schools ranged from 3.0 to 3.8.
The eleven best scores (the scores before the first big bump) were had by:
Harvard and JHop (4.8)
Duke (4.6)
UCSF, Stanford and UMich (4.5)
WashU, Penn, and Columbia (4.4)
Yale (4.3)
Cornell (4.2)
2 public schools that rock:
UCSF, UMich
usnews methodology http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/about/06med_meth_brief.php
I think it's important to note that usnews gave these surveys to "residency program directors in fields outside primary care, including surgery, psychiatry, and radiology."
Theoretically the score could take on values from 1.0 to 5.0. Compiling all the residency director scores for the 64 ranked schools gives the following statistics:
Min: 3.0
1st quartile: 3.3
Median: 3.6
3rd quartile: 4.0
Max: 4.8
Mean: 3.71
Standard Dev: 0.48
The distribution isn't normal (surprise)
There were 6 schools each with a score of 4.0, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.2.
Some comments...
Though the 3rd quartile is 4.0, there are 6 schools with a score of 4.0 and 4 schools with a score of 4.1, leaving only 11 to fill out the scores from 4.2 to 4.8. Notice the score difference between 1QR and the min is 0.3, between the median and 1QR is 0.3, between 3QR and the median is 0.4, and between the max and 3QR is 0.8. So the air gets pretty thin at the top.
Noting that 3.0 is the midway point in the theoretical scale, residency directors tend to think any top 64 school is at least midway between marginal (1.0) and exceptional (5.0).
No school got all residency directors to agree that it was exceptional (ie, no school got a 5 from everyone).
The top 31 schools (two were tied at 30) based on overall research ranking ranged from 3.5 to 4.8 on residency director score. The next 33 schools ranged from 3.0 to 3.8.
The eleven best scores (the scores before the first big bump) were had by:
Harvard and JHop (4.8)
Duke (4.6)
UCSF, Stanford and UMich (4.5)
WashU, Penn, and Columbia (4.4)
Yale (4.3)
Cornell (4.2)
2 public schools that rock:
UCSF, UMich
usnews methodology http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/about/06med_meth_brief.php