RISE score cutoff for boards

Discussion in 'Pathology' started by santender1, May 15, 2014.

  1. SDN is made possible through member donations, sponsorships, and our volunteers. Learn about SDN's nonprofit mission.
  1. santender1

    santender1 2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    9
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    does anyone know the supposed RISE cutoff score which correlates with a pass on the boards? Is it 500?
     
  2. SDN Members don't see this ad. About the ads.
  3. 2121115

    2121115 7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,674
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    Yes, it is a 500. But... not cummulative 500. You need to score 500 on each individual section of the RISE in order to make the correlation with passing.
     
  4. Sulfinator

    Sulfinator Pathology 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    393
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    Is there actual data on 500 being a significant cutoff? Or is it more a long the lines of "I know a couple of people who have failed boards and they didn't have at least a 500 on each section of the RISE?"
     
  5. 2121115

    2121115 7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,674
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    It is not entirely anecdotal. Betsy Bennett confirmed it at a CAP meeting one time.
     
  6. Autopsy101

    Autopsy101 7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    95
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    Verified
    Physician
  7. Sulfinator

    Sulfinator Pathology 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    393
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    I am familiar with this publication. It would be interesting to be able to look at the raw data and calculate a positive and negative predictive value for participants who either had at least 500 on each section or did not.
     
  8. Johnny Sunshine

    Johnny Sunshine 2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    173
    What a worthless "study". The correlation was extremely weak, only existed for a subgroup of cherry-picked size, and the majority of people in that group still passed the boards.

    The fact that people attribute worth to a report put out by the very group that makes money off of the exam bewilders me.
     
    gbwillner likes this.
  9. Elmer

    Elmer Senior Member 7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    133
    a
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2014
  10. gbwillner

    gbwillner Pastafarian Moderator Emeritus 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,055
    Location:
    You've got the Touch- You've got the Power!
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    I've been saying this for years. The study's conclusions are very suspect.

    I do believe that almost everyone who scores a 500 or better on every section of the test WILL pass the boards. But what does it prove, beyond that good test takers do well on tests? Most people who DO NOT score a 500 or better on all sections ALSO pass the boards. Great. What a waste of time.

    Use the RISE as a personal test to find your areas of strength and weakness. It's what its really good for. I feel bad for anyone who is disciplined for not performing well on this test.
     

About the ads

Share This Page