School 1: Roseman
School 2: UMKC
Summary:
Both schools cost around $400K total for tuition and living expenses. I am a California resident interested in specializing in orthodontics after dental school.
I like Roseman's 3-year program and block curriculum, but I worry it may feel rushed, and I’m unsure if its reputation will support my goal of matching into an orthodontics residency. On the other hand, UMKC’s 4-year program offers more time to prepare for residency, but the traditional grading system and multi-course load might feel more stressful.
I’d love to hear thoughts about how the reputation of these schools might impact my chances for an orthodontics residency and any insights into clinical opportunities or other factors I should consider.
- OOS
- 3-year program (saves one year of tuition and living costs).
- Block curriculum (focuses on one subject at a time).
- Pass/no pass grading system (less stress from GPA pressure).
- Opportunity to experience two different locations (Utah for the first year, Nevada for the last two). Rosemans Ortho program is in Nevada
- Very welcoming students
- Only three years to prepare for residency applications and boards
- Does Pass/No Pass affect residency decisions
- Moving between Utah and Nevada could be logistically challenging.
School 2: UMKC
- OOS
- 4-year program (more time to prepare for board exams and residency applications).
- Traditional grading system (letter grades could potentially stand out on residency applications).
- Located in Kansas City, a larger metropolitan area with diverse patient demographics.
- Established reputation as a dental school, but I am not sure if it is viewed as "stronger" than Roseman.
- 6-7 courses at a time might feel overwhelming.
- An extra year to graduate with the same degree (will graduate a year later)
- Further from home compared to Utah/Nevada.
Summary:
Both schools cost around $400K total for tuition and living expenses. I am a California resident interested in specializing in orthodontics after dental school.
I like Roseman's 3-year program and block curriculum, but I worry it may feel rushed, and I’m unsure if its reputation will support my goal of matching into an orthodontics residency. On the other hand, UMKC’s 4-year program offers more time to prepare for residency, but the traditional grading system and multi-course load might feel more stressful.
I’d love to hear thoughts about how the reputation of these schools might impact my chances for an orthodontics residency and any insights into clinical opportunities or other factors I should consider.