Step I Rx QID 1019

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

dyspareunia

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Can anyone explain how you know that Mobitz type-II is more commonly associated with His-Purkinje defect than AV block?
 
Can anyone explain how you know that Mobitz type-II is more commonly associated with His-Purkinje defect than AV block?

Because we learned it in class, so I know its true.

Plus it's not hard to reason out, AV node is the site with the highest delay, if there is a defect there you an expect the PR interval to lengthen.

Since Mobitz type-II involves random drops of QRS complexes not proceeded by changes in the PR interval you can assume there is no problem making it through the AV node, only a problem with the final conduction to the ventricles. Hence, His-Purkinje defect.

Im pretty sure it was explained better either in FA, or Rx though.
 
it helps to see the question and answer choices 🙂

Not sure how much detail I can post without violating some rule, but the question was very short.. Not much other info than below.

75 year old man gets a pacemaker to treat his heart block. His ekg shows constant PR with QRS appearing randomly.

What's the abnormality?

AV abnormality
His-purkinje
Independent contraction of atria and ventricles
Retrograde ckndjction
SA abnormality

Because we learned it in class, so I know its true.

Plus it's not hard to reason out, AV node is the site with the highest delay, if there is a defect there you an expect the PR interval to lengthen.

Since Mobitz type-II involves random drops of QRS complexes not proceeded by changes in the PR interval you can assume there is no problem making it through the AV node, only a problem with the final conduction to the ventricles. Hence, His-Purkinje defect.

Im pretty sure it was explained better either in FA, or Rx though.

There's no explanation in FA or RX other than "his-purkinje is most commonly responsible for mobitz 2"

What you say makes sense though.