Salary negotiation

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Doc1401

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
102
Reaction score
61
Hello,
Does anyone have data to support a particular median salary for 2016/2017 or something along the lines? For example, when the negotiation process occurs, it would be good to reference some actual objective data to avoid an inappropriate offer.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Hello,
Does anyone have data to support a particular median salary for 2016/2017 or something along the lines? For example, when the negotiation process occurs, it would be good to reference some actual objective data to avoid an inappropriate offer.

Psychiatry is too diverse to have such data be accurate and easily available. Best chance would be paying for MGMA data but even that is likely outdated by a couple years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
This data is irrelevant and salaries are variable by geography, practice type, setting, compensation model. Also why is it that hospitals and other healthcare groups always claim to have a mission of providing the best care, but don't want to pay more than the median salary? The median is a race to the bottom... These salary figures are based on small sample sizes and are used to keep salaries low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
why is it that hospitals and other healthcare groups always claim to have a mission of providing the best care, but don't want to pay more than the median salary? The median is a race to the bottom...

You said everything!
That`s how I feel when I talk to different employers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Don't look to MGMA, you can ask on here about your job offers and we'll best guide you on how to proceed. Remember, psych is in heavy demand and the pay must reflect this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I read recently that, in order to earn the median income, a doctor needs to be at the 60th percentile in productivity for his or her specialty... every doctor is above average.
 
Last edited:
I read recently that, in order to earn the median income, a doctor needs to be at the 60th percentile for his or her specialty... every doctor is above average.

Could you please elaborate? I am having a hard time understanding what you mean, especially the part about being at the “60th percentile for his or her specialty”.
 
I read recently that, in order to earn the median income, a doctor needs to be at the 60th percentile for his or her specialty... every doctor is above average.

The Lake Woebegone Effect? (nicely done on the day Garrison Keillor is fired for sticking his hand up some staffer's shirt...)
 
The 50th percentile is literally the median. Maybe you meant that the mean is 60th percentile?

Most likely. Although, both are generally useless unless you know the actual distribution of the data. Are they positively/negatively skewed? Are a relatively small number of people dragging the data in a certain way? Also, some salary surveys include people working part-time. In general, people are bad at constructing surveys.
 
Could you please elaborate? I am having a hard time understanding what you mean, especially the part about being at the “60th percentile for his or her specialty”.

Echoing the poster above about how MGMA isn't as useful for psychiatry. Management will try and quote you a number based on MGMA, but the reality is that most of the psychiatrists in practice don't take insurance and are not working for a facility, and therefore the reported salary figures are inaccurate. Salary figures also tend to vary wildly depending on location and actual amount of work demanded. Posters here are fairly knowledgable about the rough translation of a job and rough reflection of actual RVU and collections on the hospital side, and therefore would have a more realistic assessment of whether a job is a "good job".

As an example, 150k for an academic job, especially with significant research/admin time, is fairly reasonable, where as 350k for a typical 1 FTE inpatient/outpatient combo job in a community hospital in the Midwest with the usual 1:7 or 1:15 overnight call is fairly exploitative purely from a RVU generated vs. salary perspective, despite the face value salary differences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Could you please elaborate? I am having a hard time understanding what you mean, especially the part about being at the “60th percentile for his or her specialty”.

I edited it to include that it's 60th percentile in productive for their specialty.
 
Say the hospital in a rural area offers $250,000 base salary with some possible “quality practice” bonus of 40-60 thousand. What can be done to increase that offer?
 
Say the hospital in a rural area offers $250,000 base salary with some possible “quality practice” bonus of 40-60 thousand. What can be done to increase that offer?

There are a few things to consider in salary negotiations.

First, you need to know what your BATNA is. Google it if you don't know what that is. At what salary level are you prepared to walk? Figure that out.

Second, get a sense of what the market is like. If this rural hospital is all there is in where you want the job, you don't have a lot of alternatives.

Third, get a sense of what they can realistically offer. If this hospital job covers primarily Medicaid patients, a 250k offer will still imply a loss of 50k-100k a year. It's highly unlikely that you'll be able to bring the number up. It's possible that you can bring the workload down. If you want a raise, you should focus on that--that is, get more free time to work somewhere else on a part time basis that pays more. As a side note, hospitals of this type close down Medicaid driven psychiatric components ALL THE TIME. These individuals invariably get referred to either a state run facility with supplementary staff budget but very long waiting lists, or they continue on their progressively downward trajectory. But it's not your job or the hospital's job to fix this system at the moment. If this IS a state job, they often have a difficult time recruiting, but they can't raise their staff salary line because it's determined by the state budget. So jobs are often empty for months to years at a time. Nothing necessarily changes except that the patients to be seen will wait longer, and perhaps kill themselves (or, perhaps overdose on opioids) waiting. The government budget is insufficient and this problem is not in actuality an urgent priority by the electorate despite what may be covered in popular media.

Think of salary negotiation as collaborative not adversarial. The hospital is looking for a candidate to help them achieve a certain goal. You are looking for a fulfilling and financially rewarding job experience. Figure out what their list is, and what your list is, and where the overlap/misalignments are. Figure out which misalignments you absolutely cannot give up. It's not just a matter of salary.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
get a sense of what they can realistically offer. If this hospital job covers primarily Medicaid patients, a 250k offer will still imply a loss of 50k-100k a year. It's highly unlikely that you'll be able to bring the number up.

Medicaid reimbursement is similar to Medicare in few states such as Maryland.
So, I believe that you may be able to negotiate a better salary in those areas.
 
Top