- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
Need much appreciated input/thoughts about this program. Thanks!
Need much appreciated input/thoughts about this program. Thanks!
I don't have many concerns other than the fact that there isn't much (current) information or reviews about the program available. I'm wondering what are others general impressions of a smaller program (3 residents/yr.). Is it a wise move to live in an extremely expensive city as a resident? I guess I was hoping to get lucky and see if other members might know more about the program, because again there just isn't enough that can be gathered from online sources that I know of (i.e. residencyadvisor.info, scutwork.com, and of course SDN).It takes input to give input. What are your concerns?
Need much appreciated input/thoughts about this program. Thanks!
Program-wise, the rub is the poor 5-year first-time board pass rate (which is less than 50%). People will argue about what this means
I don't know why there would be any argument as to what it means. If you can't pass the boards at the end of your residency, then you didn't accomplish one of the main objectives of your 5 years of training. A pass rate that low should be concerning to everybody who interviews there, and shouldn't let the PD or the residents formulate a BS excuse.
However, I just looked up their first time pass rates for 2005-2010, and they were 78% for the QE and 63% for the CE...not great, but not horrible either.
Did you interview there?
I can tell you what I thought from my interview....
Also, is your username F22C1 a reference to a car engine?
For comparison, UK Witchita has first time combined pass rates of 86% and 90% in 2005-2010 and 2006-2011, respectively.
While we're on the topic of my home program, I'm interested in how I fall into the 2006-2011 numbers since I've taken the QE but not the CE....2 of my co-chiefs took (and passed) the CE in the fall immediately after the QE, so they might be included in the 2011 numbers.
These are first time board pass rates. The argument is that the folks who fail do pass eventually, anyway, so you lose some cash but it's not like you won't work or eat. Moreover, some folks say that though a necessity in gen surg, the boards don't do a good job of differentiating between good and bad surgeons.
Actually, that is horrible. The combined pass rate is the one that matters. For 2005-2010 that was 44%. Meaning only 44% of their graduates from 2005-2011 passed both parts (and thus became board certified) on the first attempt. It has improved for 2006-2011 (it's now 60%).
I had a similar interview experience. Personally, I think the PD was great and after talked to residents at UC Davis they were really sad to see him go. Expensive yes, but dang it sure would be a gorgeous place to train and live. Did you remember hearing about upper level call schedule? I imagine it could be pretty taxing with only a limited amount of residents.
Expensive yes, but dang it sure would be a gorgeous place to train and live.