- Joined
- Oct 4, 2017
- Messages
- 5,018
- Reaction score
- 9,787
physicist out with mild case of virus. Been in the field for a while but never seen the actual regulations regarding physics presence during SBRT. Are these state or CMS or just best practices?
No reason you can't tele supervise sbrt currently if the conditions call for it. Best practice is still to be there obviously, but it probably isn't feasible at all practices currentlyAgree with gator. It is considered mandatory to maintain ACR or APEX accreditation, but otherwise best practice.
However, as we've seen in the pandemic era, a lot of "ironclad" lines in the sand have been thrown out the window . . .
No reason you can't tele supervise sbrt currently if the conditions call for it. Best practice is still to be there obviously, but it probably isn't feasible at all practices currently
No reason you can't tele supervise sbrt currently if the conditions call for it. Best practice is still to be there obviously, but it probably isn't feasible at all practices currently
"Tele" presence per the CMS definition for direct supervision requires real time AV communication. Of course this doesn't really apply to hospital based anything these days right, since it went "general" supervision in Jan 2020 (?)This is only b/c of COVID-19 right? Does it require video chatting to the therapists at the console?
View attachment 302052
"Tele" presence per the CMS definition for direct supervision requires real time AV communication. Of course this doesn't really apply to hospital based anything these days right, since it went "general" supervision in Jan 2020 (?)
Institutional i think... Maybe @scarbrtj can weigh in further. Unless you are doing electronic brachy, NRC regulations would kick in and you need to be at the console while treating brachyI thought SBRT and brachytherapy were still not under 'general' supervision and required direct? Or was that institutional policies that made that distinction