You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
SCS Industry Preference
Started by lmsanscafe
Whoever has reps that actually work. Meaning, call the patients, call me with issues they become aware of, help coordinate, arrive on time, etc.
All the reps in my area are super attentive. I don't think there's a statistically significant difference in the trial to perm ratio between companies. Cost is a big factor.
ThisWhoever has reps that actually work. Meaning, call the patients, call me with issues they become aware of, help coordinate, arrive on time, etc.
Medtronic is terrible in my area. We don’t even have a rep and the guy who was supposed to be covering doesn’t respond.Whichever rep hasn't screwed me over recently. Right now, it's Medtronic.
Yep. It matters.My problem with Nevro:
D
deleted131481
Is that a picture of their new proprietary HF waveform?My problem with Nevro:
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
what caused the insane crash ?My problem with Nevro:
Declining revenue and they lost a big patent case against Boston, would be my guess.what caused the insane crash ?
Also I think the DPN push was a flop
They did a great thing with the DPN work but did not anticipate every other SCS company being to add on that indication immediately after them.
What case did they lose?Declining revenue and they lost a big patent case against Boston, would be my guess.
They did a great thing with the DPN work but did not anticipate every other SCS company being to add on that indication immediately after them.
It’s been a minute since I did SCS for peripheral neuropathy. I did a a couple with nevro but my rep is terrible and I stopped using them.
Do all the stim companies now have the indication to do SCS for DPN?
Do any stim companies have an official indication for non diabetic peripheral neuropathy?
They did a great thing with the DPN work but did not anticipate every other SCS company being to add on that indication immediately after them.
Can anyone else verify this? I’ve been told recently from my boston reps to NOT use diabetic pn as a dx.
ABT/MDT/NVRO have the DPN indication. BSX will soon enough.
why does what their stock price matter if deciding if it the best system for a patient? (unless you own nevro stock)
Because they might go bankrupt like Nuvectra or bought out and your “team” dissolved.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
well, they are going to eventually get bought out and merged in to on one of the other companies anyways. because market consolidation is part and parcel to capitalism, right?
i dont think that means that their product would "disappear"...
even now, when the battery dies, you can replace with a competitors product...
i dont think that means that their product would "disappear"...
even now, when the battery dies, you can replace with a competitors product...
I no longer do competitive swaps as it permanently eliminates the patients ability to get a MRI.
Because they might go bankrupt like Nuvectra or bought out and your “team” dissolved.
I've lived this. SCS refugees. Corporate stewardship is vital for a good business relationship.
true, however, recently something fell through the cracks and a competitive swap with leads from one manufacturer and battery from another (both respectively mri conditional), had a full body mri and did just fine.... 🤷♂️I no longer do competitive swaps as it permanently eliminates the patients ability to get a MRI.
Correct, I would like to read the case reports where a patient has been harmed by the SCS/MRI. I don’t think there have been many? I have never read one.