SDN Fairgrounds - 10th Annual Noob WW Game

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I can't shake the feeling I got from their earlier message. They also said they would be more active today. BUT... With all these votes and their earlier defensiveness... Wouldn't we expect some more protest / blame shifting from them? I'm leaning TFC rn.

That being said I'm still weary of CeeGee. But they were against us kicking inactive players. Wouldn't a wolf be okay with us yoinking a potentially innocent fellow villager?

Anyone have any thoughts on this?
I work mostly in the afternoon and evenings on non-clinical days, so I’ve been running errands. Don’t worry, I see the pitchforks and torches now, so I’ll be around. Just saying for the record, Yeet’ing me would be a mistake and the wolves are prob loving the cover.

Do wolves in this iteration have any restrictions from day interactions? I wonder if those not around are absent bc of that or similar? I don’t have a reference for 95% of the players, so I’m trying to think outside of the box until more info is available.
 
Do you have any reads on anyone? Anything you think we should take a closer look into?
I’m skeptical of ppl who want to be mayor and/or those who jump in early on someone. The only vibes I saw were fruit being a bit overly-posty, but that might be them. I post in spurts bc I take breaks throughout my work day bc I’m out-pt and can work more non-traditional hours.
 
Like I said, I missed a bunch of posts. Are you saying you would have expected her to try and deflect votes onto another inactive player?

Obviously I voted for her, and I haven't seen enough to be convinced to switch my vote, but to me that would be so obvious that it would be an even bigger red flag. She probably is just focused on defending herself and doesn't feel like she has leverage to try and direct attention towards a specific different player.

But I think she would act that way regardless of whether she was a cornered wolf, or an innocent villager who was getting targeted.
Perhaps I was thinking too much like myself. I was expecting if CeeGee was sus they would be happy to allow beans and I to evict inactive players instead of them, but they protested that.
 
I work mostly in the afternoon and evenings on non-clinical days, so I’ve been running errands. Don’t worry, I see the pitchforks and torches now, so I’ll be around. Just saying for the record, Yeet’ing me would be a mistake and the wolves are prob loving the cover.

Do wolves in this iteration have any restrictions from day interactions? I wonder if those not around are absent bc of that or similar? I don’t have a reference for 95% of the players, so I’m trying to think outside of the box until more info is available.
This is a good point. For all we know wolves could have limited posts during the day. This would somewhat explain the three barely-not present players and place more scrutiny on them.
 
:cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat:
While there are sometimes mechanics that may cause an individual to be unable to post, there would NOT be a mechanic that would blanket-group people by affiliation and limit their posting. That would be game-breaking.
:cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat::cat:
 
Do wolves in this iteration have any restrictions from day interactions? I wonder if those not around are absent bc of that or similar? I don’t have a reference for 95% of the players, so I’m trying to think outside of the box until more info is available.
This is a good point. For all we know wolves could have limited posts during the day. This would somewhat explain the three barely-not present players and place more scrutiny on them.
in the past few games i played here both as a townie and as a wolf, there were no posting limitations except for the championship game and the limit was for everyone. since then, only minimum number of posts enforced.
 
This is my biggest point of suspicion for ceegee, especially considering they were being a bit dogpiled earlier - wouldn't they push to vote an inactive player instead?
I'm not sure I'm swayed enough to change my vote [yet] but I'm on board with your logic.
I felt like immediately pointing fingers after being dogpiled on-without any convincing argument or reads on anyone-would be more of a red flag that just screams, "cornered wolf!"
 
I dunno, I can see a risk/reward mechanism where a wolf could get an extra….something (?) but it’d cause them to be mute for a day cycle. I played at least one game in the past where someone couldn’t post during the day if it was limited in # of words? It was something weird like that.
 
Ok here goes...

I think beans is wolf of wolf affiliated. Ik we've been over the mayoral stuff, but
1) held a lead and kept it, basically no one had a chance to beat them
2) is the only one who put me as sus with no real justification after I mentioned the mayor stuff
3) I also didn't vote for them and campaigned for rae
4) after all that, I think I almost got eaten last night
5) despite being mayor, has a pattern of disappearance today - voted for an absentee player and checked out

Beyond that my reads are vague and mostly vibes:

Village:
Indy
Fruits
Rae
PBC
katie

Uncertain/yeet for inactive:
T4C
Skisk
Spiane
Nicole

Sus:
Spurs
Beans
Ceegee
Nicole
Vamp (very light on this one given irl circumstances)

Edit: forgot some people 🤣
wait is nicole both sus and uncertain?
 
Ok here goes...

I think beans is wolf of wolf affiliated. Ik we've been over the mayoral stuff, but
1) held a lead and kept it, basically no one had a chance to beat them
2) is the only one who put me as sus with no real justification after I mentioned the mayor stuff
3) I also didn't vote for them and campaigned for rae
4) after all that, I think I almost got eaten last night
5) despite being mayor, has a pattern of disappearance today - voted for an absentee player and checked out

Beyond that my reads are vague and mostly vibes:

Village:
Indy
Fruits
Rae
PBC
katie

Uncertain/yeet for inactive:
T4C
Skisk
Spiane
Nicole

Sus:
Spurs
Beans
Ceegee
Nicole
Vamp (very light on this one given irl circumstances)

Edit: forgot some people 🤣
i've bolded things that stick out to me as odd... your reasons behind beans being wolf just make no sense?

- they're wolf because you didn't vote for them?..
- you made the false statement that beans was in the lead from the get-go and that there was no opportunity for others to compete, when rae was in the lead in the beginning, others joined in on campaigns and very early on there was a large range of votes, it was anyone's game.
- i don't understand where the decision that you were almost eaten last night came from? unless you got some sort of message at EOD stating something incriminating, literally anyone could have been yeeted. why you are so certain it was you is confusing and feels almost as if you're trying to paint this weird martyr-esque picture..
- listing nicole twice. this could be genuine mistake, or noob wolf trying to decide where to put people without real rhyme or reason in an effort to blend in with the crowd.
 
I dunno, I can see a risk/reward mechanism where a wolf could get an extra….something (?) but it’d cause them to be mute for a day cycle. I played at least one game in the past where someone couldn’t post during the day if it was limited in # of words? It was something weird like that.
mods confirmed this isn't the case. please don't try to confuse us or try to get us to overanalyze something that isn't applicable to this scenario.
 
i've bolded things that stick out to me as odd... your reasons behind beans being wolf just make no sense?

- they're wolf because you didn't vote for them?..
- you made the false statement that beans was in the lead from the get-go and that there was no opportunity for others to compete, when rae was in the lead in the beginning, others joined in on campaigns and very early on there was a large range of votes, it was anyone's game.
- i don't understand where the decision that you were almost eaten last night came from? unless you got some sort of message at EOD stating something incriminating, literally anyone could have been yeeted. why you are so certain it was you is confusing and feels almost as if you're trying to paint this weird martyr-esque picture..
- listing nicole twice. this could be genuine mistake, or noob wolf trying to decide where to put people without real rhyme or reason in an effort to blend in with the crowd.

I warned you it would be an unpopular opinion 😅 I can't really provide any justification beyond that bc I just don't have any more info
 
TLDR:
sksisk has been assumed just to be an inactive for now, as they still haven't come to defend themself or interacted at all since being voted for this AM

main suspects currently are T4C due to defensiveness at being questioned and CeeGee due to inconsistency.
I am here!
unyeet sksisk

Was meaning to do this after my read list, they haven't come to defend themself which I think a wolf would do. I think this player is just inactive.
I am not a wolf. Hope this helps
 
I warned you it would be an unpopular opinion 😅 I can't really provide any justification beyond that bc I just don't have any more info
it's not that its unpopular. anyone is a suspect until proven otherwise. it's your reasons rather that make raise an eyebrow. particularly the claim beans was in the lead and that you were going to be eaten last night without providing too much to support that.

i could say "i was almost eaten last night because my dog had an emergency and i would be easy to eliminate since im not wolf and my inactivity proved to be a weakness for town and an upper hand for wolves" but there's still no real rhyme or reason to back that up since i don't know for certain i was going to be yeeted.
 
currently catching up, what questions can I answer for you?
1. thoughts on the current yeet list so far? do you agree with it? disagree? anyone you feel should be looked at today?
2. reads list?
3. thoughts on mayoral election
4. thoughts on other read lists? any you disagree or agree with?
 
currently catching up, what questions can I answer for you?
rem92ezykqh61.jpg


No curse words for @GoSpursGo
 
also small tip for ultra newbies, if you have specific questions for specific people, it will help if you @ them directly instead of quoting messages (if they are currently inactive/offline/away etc) it'll help speed up the question answering process
 
it's not that its unpopular. anyone is a suspect until proven otherwise. it's your reasons rather that make raise an eyebrow.
Genuinely all I've got for you, sorry 🥲 definitely hope I'm wrong and not voting or recommending yeet on it this round.

I am here!

I am not a wolf. Hope this helps
Well that settles it then
 
I have confidence in Apoptosis, as far as sussing anyone out, I am honestly totally unsure but....

If you are skeptical of inactive people I feel like that is a red flag because to me that's an easy way to be like its DEF not me but like look at THEM. and like gaslight others onto other people

(I am leaving for a class, I will be back in a couple hours, THIS DOES NOT MEAN I AM A WOLF) The fact that I got to NCSU and we are the wolfpack is completely unrelated! 🙂
 
I have confidence in Apoptosis, as far as sussing anyone out, I am honestly totally unsure but....

If you are skeptical of inactive people I feel like that is a red flag because to me that's an easy way to be like its DEF not me but like look at THEM. and like gaslight others onto other people

(I am leaving for a class, I will be back in a couple hours, THIS DOES NOT MEAN I AM A WOLF) The fact that I got to NCSU and we are the wolfpack is completely unrelated! 🙂
Being suspicious of inactives isn’t a red flag IMO. Laying low is a known strategy for wolves as giving less info helps them avoid suspicion. Me and beans who initially voted for you were not under scrutiny at the time of the vote either.

Regardless - we kind of backed off our suspicion of you, but now that you’re back your defense is pretty weak :bullcrap:
 
It's interesting to me that a good number of players, even among those who have been active today, still have yet to vote.
if you’re gonna call me out just @ me next time, silly!!

i traditionally dont vote until later in the day, made that disclaimer pagessss ago
 
So after D1 I very loosely had @katiemcat and @sksisk as village reads after missing the major vote. Mayor voting is pretty low stakes for wolves (as far as analyzing voting patterns) and the fact that they were willing to miss the day indicates to me 1) they're wolves that were too busy to even read their role pm and find out they're a wolf, or 2) they're village and could risk missing the mayor vote without too much suspicion. If they knew they were a wolf I would have expected at least a quick check in.

I did think it was odd that @apoptosis09 never self voted for mayor even though they were on the board at one point and even made one short "campaign" type post.

Already shared my @fruitsalad thoughts

And then I'm pretty sure that @Therapist4Chnge, @CeeGee14, @spiane, and @nicoledoesvetstuff all made only one or two game play posts by early N1. I haven't updated my notes for today's activity yet, but I thought these voting-but-very-little-activity players were worth noting as people potentially trying to avoid suspicion.
I had a crazy weekend and I wasn't active today because I was volunteering at first-year orientation all day. I'm also quite overwhelmed by this whole thing bc I've never used SDN this way before. Please bear with me lol. I'm trying to come up with insightful things to say but I'm struggling.
 
I have confidence in Apoptosis, as far as sussing anyone out, I am honestly totally unsure but....

If you are skeptical of inactive people I feel like that is a red flag because to me that's an easy way to be like its DEF not me but like look at THEM. and like gaslight others onto other people

(I am leaving for a class, I will be back in a couple hours, THIS DOES NOT MEAN I AM A WOLF) The fact that I got to NCSU and we are the wolfpack is completely unrelated! 🙂

I am reading through 6 pages of messages so give me a moment
i’d like to know how you read each other
 
For me, it’s purely just not playing in forever and the first day I see my name floated. Someone lamented about going out early/first in another game, and I want to avoid that.

What some think is avoidant or Wolfy is just me being a bit neuro spicy. It’s hard to decipher nuance on here. I actually thought I was being helpful pointing out the timing of posts, but that is….bad? I feel like I play a pretty straightforward way, so getting picked off early is really my biggest concern bc guile and deception aren’t really in my DNA.

CG, you def seemed a bit dodgy, but it was the weekend, so I figured I’d give a day or two before making an initial judgment.
I can still sway back to CG, but I figured I’d move over to where I felt the strongest. It’s definitely challenging being neurospicy on here, so, noted!
 
I am very old

NGL, this feels like Survivor (do the kids these days still watch that with me?)... you never want to be That Guy who starts immediately throwing out names cuz it gets you targeted 🤐
You did that to katie tho lol when she was inactive due to being sick. I'm pretty sure that was the first accusatory post in the thread
 
Top