- Joined
- Jan 8, 2019
- Messages
- 416
- Reaction score
- 319
So how "polished" do secondaries have to be? I know there's some adcoms on here who state that it needs to be just as good as the primary, but realistically that's just not possible for most students. That being said, I haven't made any erroneous spelling or grammar mistakes, but as I look back to re-use some of my prompts, I see areas that could be improved (I use "provide" twice in the same sentence and could have used a different word instead). Are these areas that adcoms scrutinize? I feel like as an adcom who has to go through a lot of secondaries, they would be more focused on content rather than a few small blemishes on the secondary (not errors, just blemishes that could be improved), especially when everything else is in order like grades, mcat, and EC.
RANT: The more I'm exposed to the medical school application process, the more I feel that SDN explodes/exaggerates things way out of context. An example is an MD letter. A large chunk of schools I have applied for recommend MD letters, but based off of the advice I've seen on SDN about how worthless they are, I failed to ask any of the MDs I work with as a scribe. Another is applying within 2 weeks and the mentality that it is looked down upon if you don't (maybe it's not as good as someone applying immediately, but the consensus makes it appear that I would actually get negative points if I apply within a month instead of 2 weeks. That's just crazy and seems unreasonable). I do think that SDN is a good way to better yourself as an applicant though based off of the level of unrealism on here, it motivated me to do a lot of extra stuff that I otherwise would not have done which has benefited my application.
Sorry for the rant, maybe this is one way people actually reply to my threads though instead of view them and ignore.
RANT: The more I'm exposed to the medical school application process, the more I feel that SDN explodes/exaggerates things way out of context. An example is an MD letter. A large chunk of schools I have applied for recommend MD letters, but based off of the advice I've seen on SDN about how worthless they are, I failed to ask any of the MDs I work with as a scribe. Another is applying within 2 weeks and the mentality that it is looked down upon if you don't (maybe it's not as good as someone applying immediately, but the consensus makes it appear that I would actually get negative points if I apply within a month instead of 2 weeks. That's just crazy and seems unreasonable). I do think that SDN is a good way to better yourself as an applicant though based off of the level of unrealism on here, it motivated me to do a lot of extra stuff that I otherwise would not have done which has benefited my application.
Sorry for the rant, maybe this is one way people actually reply to my threads though instead of view them and ignore.