SEEK question bank relevance

[lostarkenthusiast]

---

Members don't see this ad.

I been getting ready for my boards by doing the seek question bank, and oh boy does it include a BUNCH of histopathology for some reason. Additionally many of their questions I feel are not relevant to practice whatsoever, often asking about super rare diseases.

I get that this format is common for board exams across specialties, but what i find interesting is that SEEK content which is made by chest, feels vastly different compared to the ITE exam questions which are made by apccmpd, which feel more clinically relevant. I was wondering if anybody used other resources other than SEEK, and if I should be doing anything else than SEEK, ATS reading list combo.

 

[tartesos]

Seek sucks in that sense but traditionally most people I know just do that and pass so I will too.

I’m signing up for the chest board review in August, debating in person vs virtual.


Will do the other question bank for shiggles, just because it’s how I like to study for boards and I have cme $ available.