cusp of carabelli said:
isn't that second statment just as broad as the first? and the fact that carries rate has been going down doesn't really support this...
To play Devil's advocate with you here Cusp, you could very well argue that one of the causative factors associted with the decline in the caries rate is the increase in the placement of sealants in the last 15 years
😱 😕
The other BIG factor though is in the dietary control over the population where sealants are most beneficial, children and teens. The sugar consumption rates amongst that generation is increasing, and the parental control is often very difficult with whats available in many schools systems and that doesn't even begin to hit on the peer pressure factor (i.e. "mommy, little Johnny has Gatoraide with his lunch, why can't I??" if you don't have kids, just wait, you'll see what I'm talking about
😉 )
From what I see in my practice, kids that don't get their 1st molars sealed will on average have restorations placed in 2 of them by the time their 2nd molars errupt, kids that get the 1st molars sealed will have less than 1 restored by the time their 2nd molars errupr(that's the real world numbers from my office in rural Connecticut).
The thing that I really find ironic in situations like this, is that the most common reason why parents won't have their children's teeth sealed in my office is money(my partner and I recommend sealants to every child). In these kids, if they get a carious lesion on one of those teeth, those same parents will be the first one's insisting that their child's teeth be restored with "tooth colored" material. The real irony is that in my office, the cost of a 1 surface posterior composite is $15 more than the cost of 4 sealants
😱 In a sense, by trying to save money, those same parents just paid more, or as I like to put it, they just contributed to my vacation house fund
😀