- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 148
- Reaction score
- 91
The details have not come out-- but the minute I hear of a shooting at a "medical facility" its opioid related until proven otherwise. We'll see. What security measures do you all have in place?
Wow--sadly is more evidence of my initial concern....No one shoots up a sports med clinic for not getting a USGI...Facebook chatter says it’s a spine surgeon and sports medicine doctor (Preston Phillips and Stephanie Husen) from the orthopedic clinic. In addition to two of their staff.
no opioidsThe details have not come out-- but the minute I hear of a shooting at a "medical facility" its opioid related until proven otherwise. We'll see. What security measures do you all have in place?
the question is... were they being totally negligent and ignoring him or were they treating him within "reason" but patient had unrealistic expectations...I am with you all. the second I saw this, I presumed opioids related.
The guy asked for "assistance" after the surgery. That usually means pain is bad and wanted meds.
The other doc shot was an IM/Sports person right? That doc was possibly the pre-postop med manage.
![]()
Bulletproof Medical Lab Coat NIJ IIIA
<p> <a title="front" href="https://turbifycdn.com/ty/cdn/yhst-98642741707334/frontlabcoat.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://turbifycdn.com/ty/cdn/yhst-98642741707334/frontlabcoat.jpg" alt="frontlab coat" width="200" height="200" /></a><img...www.bulletblocker.com
the question is... were they being totally negligent and ignoring him or were they treating him within "reason" but patient had unrealistic expectations...
If the guy bought a gun that day to shoot them up, likely unrealistic expectations regardless of what they did.the question is... were they being totally negligent and ignoring him or were they treating him within "reason" but patient had unrealistic expectations...
When my patients are in extreme pain, they are not well enough to go out browsing the gun section. He wasn’t even on a walker or cane.If the guy bought a gun that day to shoot them up, likely unrealistic expectations regardless of what they did.
Minimally invasive self defenseYikes!! I agree that it will result in even more unreasonable referrals to "pain management" for post-op pain management. Perhaps firearms training and self-defense should be part of fellowship.
Dude...WTHeck.The shooter’s wife was a family med doc who worked for St Francis also.
said no one ever! I guess the patient entitlement is something that i am very against precisely because of the nonsense above. patients think that we are like burger king - they must get what they want or else... either they become aggressive, berate, threaten, or in tragic circumstances they kill their physician. how incredibly tragic and sad and a telling sign of our times.I want a referral for PT or I am going to shoot up your clinic!
Wow. That is nuts.The shooter’s wife was a family med doc who worked for St Francis also.
Plenty of people own guns that are not entitled and have an understanding that not everything is your way and therefore don't shoot up the place. People who feel that they must always get their way typically do this type of thing. It's no different than I'll sue you if you don't (fill in the blank) mentality.does this happen in the USA b/c americans are entitled or because you can get a gun as easy as a lollipop?
you don't hear about this anywhere else.
my guess is both
Plenty of people own guns that are not entitled and have an understanding that not everything is your way and therefore don't shoot up the place. People who feel that they must always get their way typically do this type of thing. It's no different than I'll sue you if you don't (fill in the blank) mentality.
They don't, but they do destroy lives. The correlation was the mentality though.i didnt know that lawsuits tear flesh and puncture organs....
Where do you get your lollipops?does this happen in the USA b/c americans are entitled or because you can get a gun as easy as a lollipop?
you don't hear about this anywhere else.
my guess is both
“You don’t hear about this anywhere else”? You’re saying only mass shootings occur in the US or occur at a disproportionate rate? Again parroting MSNBC talking points or do you have data you’d like to share?does this happen in the USA b/c americans are entitled or because you can get a gun as easy as a lollipop?
you don't hear about this anywhere else.
my guess is both
I think entitlement, pure and simple. Like incels. I don't get what I want so I throw a tantrum because it's not fair.does this happen in the USA b/c americans are entitled or because you can get a gun as easy as a lollipop?
you don't hear about this anywhere else.
my guess is both
“You don’t hear about this anywhere else”? You’re saying only mass shootings occur in the US or occur at a disproportionate rate? Again parroting MSNBC talking points or do you have data you’d like to share?
I think entitlement, pure and simple. Like incels. I don't get what I want so I throw a tantrum because it's not fair.
I'm not willing to change society and freedoms for these people. I accept the risk.
We need to not get hysterical every time we have one of these. There are crazy, entitled would-be killers on every city block who could be triggered to violence.
Serious question: Is there a particular set of laws that you think would have prevented this? I think we could have eliminated the AR-15, limited clip size in handguns, had a red flag law and a waiting period, raised the minimum age, prevented gun shows and abolished the NRA.
Still would have happened. Still would get hysterical.
I think entitlement, pure and simple. Like incels. I don't get what I want so I throw a tantrum because it's not fair.
I'm not willing to change society and freedoms for these people. I accept the risk.
We need to not get hysterical every time we have one of these. There are crazy, entitled would-be killers on every city block who could be triggered to violence.
Serious question: Is there a particular set of laws that you think would have prevented this? I think we could have eliminated the AR-15, limited clip size in handguns, had a red flag law and a waiting period, raised the minimum age, prevented gun shows and abolished the NRA.
Still would have happened. Still would get hysterical.
We need to move away from "progressive" centralized control, state parenting, state education, state healthcare. I believe this has a lot to do with people going off the rails. If we continue in this direction, the next step will be controlling the media, removing anything that could be used as a weapon, etc.So, is there any reform you would support, or is everything pointless?
Except that countries with more centralized control and state healthcare don’t have these mass shooting problems so this is based on what exactly? You are just so sure it should be true?We need to move away from "progressive" centralized control, state parenting, state education, state healthcare. I believe this has a lot to do with people going off the rails. If we continue in this direction, the next step will be controlling the media, removing anything that could be used as a weapon, etc.
To me, reform means getting back to our roots with a culture of 2 parent homes, local values, local education, local healthcare, fee for service, etc.
I think American culture is generally more violent than some in Europe. We have a lot of drug and gang-related violence, which seem to be included in "mass shootings" these days.Except that countries with more centralized control and state healthcare don’t have these mass shooting problems so this is based on what exactly? You are just so sure it should be true?
everything is pointless because gun rights congre$$people have ve$ted intere$t in maintaining $tatu$ quo.So, is there any reform you would support, or is everything pointless?
there is a lot of crime in European countries. the reason it is so bloody in the US is because of guns.I think American culture is generally more violent than some in Europe. We have a lot of drug and gang-related violence, which seem to be included in "mass shootings" these days.
The laws of a society, including gun laws, reflect its culture, they don't shape it. That's just my opinion.
Who doesn't want racism taught? Are you referring to the issue with CRT? I don't think most people are against racism being taught. I think what they (me included) are concerned with is singling out one group of people and pointing out all the bad points and wrongs in history while ignoring the good ones.arming teachers while telling them not to teach about racism is ludicrous.
unless you are a private seller at the auction.Auctions have background checks. Online or professional in person.
The background check loophole, aka “gun show loophole,” refers to the scenario that, barring any additional requirements, prohibited purchasers (including violent offenders) are able to avoid background checks at gun shows by purchasing guns from unlicensed sellers and private individuals. “Private individuals” is a loose term under the Firearm Owners Protection Act that includes any private seller who does not rely on gun sales as the primary means of income.
➢ Pursuant to the Brady Act, if a vendor is a federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL), they are required to perform a background check prior to completing the sale of the firearm. o However, unlicensed sellers (vendors and private individuals) are also permitted to sell firearms at gun shows. As an unlicensed seller, that individual or vendor is not required to keep records of sales, and is not required to perform background checks. Thus, an individual who would be prohibited from purchasing a gun under federal law, such as a felon or domestic abuser, is be able to purchase a gun through an individual or unlicensed vendor.
It is estimated that 25-50% of gun show sales are from unlicensed or private individual sellers. The guns used in the Columbine High School, 101 California Street, and 2010 Pentagon shooting were all purchased at gun shows through this loophole.
Presently, a private seller can rent table space and carry a “private sale,” or other sign that indicates to purchasers that no paperwork, background check, or recordkeeping are required.
I don't dispute what you're saying.everything is pointless because gun rights congre$$people have ve$ted intere$t in maintaining $tatu$ quo.
but....
1. assault rifle bans to those under 22. the mental stability is just not there - particularly for males - until after age 21.
2. limitation on amount of ammunition that can be bought by those under 22.
3. very strict punishment for anyone found skirting the law - ie buying assault weapons for someone under 22. mandatory jail time.
4. background checks on everyone, including at auctions
5. a cooling off period for purchase of assault weapons of 1 week, especially to get time to do background checks
6. limit gun capacity, probably 10 rounds. i know lobel can arm and reload super fast, but most of these killers cannot because they dont do the training.
good guys with guns are not the key. arming teachers while telling them not to teach about racism is ludicrous.
the best policy is to make sure that bad guys dont get guns.
there is a lot of crime in European countries. the reason it is so bloody in the US is because of guns.
the rate of serious assault in the US in 2018 was 248. homicide rate 5.
France in 2018 serious assault 375. homicide 1.2
Germany serious assault 164. homicide 0.95
Australia serious assault 292. homicide rate 0.89
Canada serious assault 150. homicide rate 1.76. thank you message 148.
we compare "favorably" with 2nd world countries like
Brazil serious assault 274 and homicide 27.4
Argentina serious assault 306 homicide 5
take a guess as to which countries have gun laws and which do not...
Why not? It's fun discussing things with you.the federal government is not going to go out and seize your guns.
im not taking the bait. sorry.
but wait, you say, its the rate that matters...
look at this graphic from wikipedia:
View attachment 355969