- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,290
- Reaction score
- 8,804
Hi everyone, you may remember me as the person with extreme post-GRE anxiety due to low scores. I'm hoping to apply to Clinical PhD programs this upcoming fall for entry in 2009.
Well, recently my unofficial advisor (as I call this particular professor) told me that I just don't have the requirements for top tier clinical PhD programs, in terms of GPA, GRE, and research/clinical experience. My GPA is 3.7 general, 3.8 psych. My general GRE is 1000 or so, and I haven't taken the subject yet. If you count my experimental psych class, I have about a year and a half of research experience. I did my own study for my experimental class, am involved in the research lab of one of our dept's clinical psychologists, and am hopefully going to do a study of my own this fall or so. My experimental class study is getting published in our school's academic journal, nothing big, but I am first author. I'm also presenting a poster at a conference this spring, and may be third author on a poster at another this fall. I volunteer at a local center for sexual assault victims, where I co-facilitate a support group for the pre-elementary age group.
I'm not really sure what to do now. At first I decided to shoot more for lower tier because I'm more interested in clinical than research so I don't need a top research schoo, but I looked and most of my dream "perfect fit" schools are top tier. I am wondering if I should apply to maybe two or so just to see what happens, or if I should just shoot for second or lower tier. I am not sure if the GRE is my biggest (only?) true setback or not; I'm planning on retaking it, but I'm not sure if I'll do any better. And I would definitely be fine with being an RA for a few years, but I'm not sure if, a few years down the line, even having a ton of research experience would make up for the bad GRE at a top tier program where the average applicant has 1200-1300.
So, (yet again) any advice would be appreciated. I guess what I'm wondering is, should I just try for a few top-tier programs and see what happens, or not?
Well, recently my unofficial advisor (as I call this particular professor) told me that I just don't have the requirements for top tier clinical PhD programs, in terms of GPA, GRE, and research/clinical experience. My GPA is 3.7 general, 3.8 psych. My general GRE is 1000 or so, and I haven't taken the subject yet. If you count my experimental psych class, I have about a year and a half of research experience. I did my own study for my experimental class, am involved in the research lab of one of our dept's clinical psychologists, and am hopefully going to do a study of my own this fall or so. My experimental class study is getting published in our school's academic journal, nothing big, but I am first author. I'm also presenting a poster at a conference this spring, and may be third author on a poster at another this fall. I volunteer at a local center for sexual assault victims, where I co-facilitate a support group for the pre-elementary age group.
I'm not really sure what to do now. At first I decided to shoot more for lower tier because I'm more interested in clinical than research so I don't need a top research schoo, but I looked and most of my dream "perfect fit" schools are top tier. I am wondering if I should apply to maybe two or so just to see what happens, or if I should just shoot for second or lower tier. I am not sure if the GRE is my biggest (only?) true setback or not; I'm planning on retaking it, but I'm not sure if I'll do any better. And I would definitely be fine with being an RA for a few years, but I'm not sure if, a few years down the line, even having a ton of research experience would make up for the bad GRE at a top tier program where the average applicant has 1200-1300.
So, (yet again) any advice would be appreciated. I guess what I'm wondering is, should I just try for a few top-tier programs and see what happens, or not?