- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 160
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 50
- Pre-Pharmacy


i think its ok to feel bad but i guess you can drive down over weekends and stuff. if you are doing it for them, to give them better life. everyone has to make sacrifices, maybe its easier for me to say since im not married or have kids but thre are tons of people out there waitin to get in and you have the opportunity to make something of ur self so. go for it. 4 years and you can be with the for the rest of your life you want to ahha.I will be leaving (about 7 hrs away) for my P1 class next week, and will be leaving my husband and two kids ( 3 & 5 yrs of age). Although my spouse told me he'll take care of them, but I still am worried about
leaving my loved one's behind for school.
Yes, you should FEEL bad. You're their mother. I know you are doing it to give them a better life but people say that all the time, it still doesn't make it right. Probably they can't go with you for whatever reason, husband can't get a job in your school area, etc, etc, but you make do and live with your kids, even if you have to go thousands of dollars in debt and borrow more money. They are 3 and 5 they need their mom. 😱
It's like the same with the people who put their kids in day care. Day care providers are no substitution for parents, no matter how small part of the day it is.
I tend to somewhat agree with moolman. Kids that age need their mommy and won't be able to understand why mommy left. It's an abstract concept for them and they won't get it. All they'll really understand is that mommy left. I think kids should come first and formost! Your children should be your first priority IMO. What you want should be secondary. Good parents make sacrifices for their children by putting their kids first.
IMO, you should not break up the "family unit".
Yeah, you should feel bad.
Now, if they come with you...that's a different story.
I know that's not what you were wanting to hear, but that's how I feel about it and I'm not going to sugar coat it.
I am just wondering, what exactly do you and Moolman suggest ? Perhaps, the rest of her family is unable to move this instant with her due to a number of reasons. Are you guys suggesting she should drop out of pharmacy school to be with her kids immediately ?
... Good thing Cheburashka was here defending.
p.s. sometimes it's wise to stay away from the Internet when dealing sensitive matters because people tend to have less of a conscience online.
First of all, there's nothing to defend. I'm simply voicing my opinion of the situation. Although it may not be the "popular" opinion.
I do have a conscience tealish. I don't understand why you think I don't have one. Why should I feel bad for voicing how I feel? I just think kids should come first. Apparently, not everybody agrees with that. If the original poster didn't want to hear different opinions, then you're right, she shouldn't have posted. Remember, opinions are like *******s...everybody has one.
First of all, there's nothing to defend. I'm simply voicing my opinion of the situation. Although it may not be the "popular" opinion.
I do have a conscience tealish. I don't understand why you think I don't have one. Why should I feel bad for voicing how I feel? I just think kids should come first. Apparently, not everybody agrees with that. If the original poster didn't want to hear different opinions, then you're right, she shouldn't have posted. Remember, opinions are like *******s...everybody has one.
The only thing you should feel bad about is not being able to spell "feel" correctly,
Although I see your rational, I think there is some serious flaws with it:
1. If she decided to wait, how long exactly should she wait ? If she waits 5 years for example, the kids are still going to be young and require her attention. If she waits 10 years, the kids are going to be teenages and some of the teenagers these days have problems waaaaaaay crazier than kids. I am talking drugs, alcohol, unprotected sex, suicide attempts and you have to keep in mind teenagers from your typical american family face these kinds of problems, not just somebody who grew up in the ghetto.
My point is "leaving your kids" now is not going to be any better than "leaving your kids later" scenario. There simply is no right time. So, why not do it now ?
2. She can't really reverse back time and go to pharmacy school prior to having kids. She has to deal with the situation she has now. And she is accepted to go to pharmacy school now. With pharmacy schools getting more competitive each year, there is no guarantee she will be a competitive applicant in a few years. Also in a few years she might feel differently about going to school and give up on her dreams. A close friend of mine has a relative who was accepted to attend UCSF med school in her twenties. At that point she already had kids ( just like the author) and decided to wait for the same reasons you suggested. End result: she is now in her 50's working as a "customer service representative" making barely above minimum wage. She could have been A DOCTOR with education from UCSF and she does what now ?
It would be nice that while you're assuming the position of grammar nazi, to at least end your sentence with a period like this one.

it Would Be Nice That While You're Assuming The Position Of Grammar Nazi, To At Least End Your Sentence With A Period Like This One.
It would be nice that while you're assuming the position of grammar nazi, to at least end your sentence with a period like this one.




I will be leaving (about 7 hrs away) for my P1 class next week, and will be leaving my husband and two kids ( 3 & 5 yrs of age). Although my spouse told me he'll take care of them, but I still am worried about
leaving my loved one's behind for school.
It would be nice that while you're assuming the position of grammar nazi, to at least end your sentence with a period like this one.
Oh Sparda, you are such a good sport!lol, I was staring at the screen for 30 seconds before pressing submit to check for any spelling mistakes and of course I miss the punctuation mark.




Think of all the children without loving parents! Just because you aren't going to see them as much during school doesn't mean you're a bad parent or your kids are going to be messed up. There are still weekends, breaks, and summer. I was raised by a single mother. She had no college education and had to work extra just to make enough money to support us. She worked 50+ hours a week. I use to spend the entire summer with my grandparents because there was no one to watch me while my mom worked. Trust me, I didn't come out any worse than kids who had a stay at home mother and a father. When they are older they won't even remember the time away from you, they will remember the time spent with you. I have so many great memories of my mother, and having fun with my grandparents, I don't even remember the months I went without seeing her! And when you are done with school you will have a good, flexible job so that you have even more time with your children. 😀
I don't know if this story adds up or not...
In a different post by the OP, she claims her kids are 6 & 3 yrs old. I know that could be a typo (5 or 6?) for the age of the oldest child, but something else just doesn't seem right either....
She posts a thread with a topic destined to get a ton of feedback, only to not have said a simple thank you for your support or thanks for your thoughts. Not even a single word out of the OP since this thread was posted over 48 hours ago.
Just doesn't seem right to me, IMHO. I mean could this be a troll who has been planting seeds with seemingly honest posts and then BAM, the troll hits the homerun pitch to set off a debate on a known hotbed topic just to get people's feathers ruffled.
Once parents stop being selfish and put their kids first, the world would be a better place.
moolman,
My grandfather had diabetes. When he was diagnosed, he was instructed by his doctor to restrict the amount of sugar and starch in his diet. Where I'm from, a lot of our food is high in starch. His friends - who also had diabetes - would visit and tell him, "Eat X. I ate it and nothing happened to me." His reply? "Look at my children. They are too young to be without a father." Those friends of his died young. My grandpa lived until he was 89.
Having the foresight to do what is necessary so that your kids have a better future, THAT is putting your kids first in the finest sense. And that is what the OP is doing.
...I don't envy your wife.
On the contrary, what my grandpa did has everything to do with this topic. He denied himself the temporary pleasure of eating unhealthy food so that he would be alive and with his children as they grew up. The future he was trying to secure for his children was one in which he was present. That was the point.No offense but what your grandfather did has nothing to do with putting your children first and this topic. What we're talking about is doing something that takes away from your children but that may benefit them in the long run. How does eating healthy food take anything away from his children? Eating healthy food does nothing to harm or take away from his kids and he should want to eat healthy anyway. Besides that not eating healthy really isn't a sacrafice, no matter how much good unhealthy food is around the house. 🙂
My philosophy is very simple. Children first, no matter what. They didn't ask to be brought into this world, so they actually deserve all priority. Some parents don't feel that way and that's the sad part.
It's your kids and you do what's right, I never said anything about not staying home with your kids was bad if circumstances didn't permit.
People do what they got to do for the future and my point is, you can justify it a million ways in your mind but it still doesn't make it right. Plain and Simple.
You may not envy my wife but I don't envy your children. I put their needs way above mine and in the future if I don't I'm not going to try to justify it, I will just chalk it up to me being selfish and doing what I want.
cheburashka,
Kids come first, there's never a justification to leave your children, even to pursue a pharmacy career that will monetarily benefit them in the future. Even if someone offered you a million dollars to live away from your childred for a year, it's not justified.
Once parents stop being selfish and put their kids first, the world would be a better place. In your situation, do you honestly not believe you would of been better off if your Mom stayed with you and was not raised by relatives. Yes, I know your Mom did it to benefit the future but still, look at the overall picture.
Hey, they are your kids so you do what you want, leave them in daycare all day long while you work and justify it by saying that you are putting a roof over their heads. Let them grow up only seeing their parents face in the evenings. Why do you think so many kids are messed up these days.
I guess I've been brain washed by listening to Dr. Laura on the radio. She always advocates putting the kids number one, such as if parents get divorced, she states that they should not remarry until the kid is 18 because a new husband or wife, takes away from the kids. It's not their fault you got divorced so why should they suffer. She even goes as far as to say that if you have young kids and are a woman, not to get remarried because sometimes, guys who are willing to marry women that have young kids and don't have kids of their own turn out to be pedophiles. Even if this was true in only one instance, that's good enough reason for me.
Good luck
lol, I was staring at the screen for 30 seconds before pressing submit to check for any spelling mistakes and of course I miss the punctuation mark.