- Joined
 - Jun 1, 2015
 
- Messages
 - 67
 
- Reaction score
 - 14
 
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
		
			
		
		
	
	
	
		
			
		
		
	
								
							
							@Lawper My adviser said that the Psych section will be looked at separately, so I actually have a score of ~32 on the chem/phys, bio, and verbal sections. Still think a retake isn't advisable considering the low gpa?
A 32 and 3.5 is perfectly capable of getting into a good number of schools if you have good EC's/LOR's, and you have a score higher than that. You don't need a 3.9+/35+ to get into schools, just check the MSAR to see if you are in a decent range of schools 10-90th percentiles and calculate if you think you have a fair shot.@Lawper My adviser said that the Psych section will be looked at separately, so I actually have a score of ~32 on the chem/phys, bio, and verbal sections. Still think a retake isn't advisable considering the low gpa?
This is not really directed at the OP but what I hate most about SDN is people with 35+ MCAT scores wondering if they are in bad shape.
How can people intelligent enough to score that high on the exam be so neurotic and insecure about their credentials while at the same time demonstrating an inability to do a simple google search? The numbers never lie, you will be fine. While people like me that scored ~50% on VR not so much.
You got a freaking PERFECT SCORE on one section.
Anyone who thinks you should retake that is crazy.
I talked to my adviser today and he was clearly unhappy about me not listening to his advice. He said he's going to delay submitting my committee letter so that I'll have more time to think it over.
You better take that fat stack of acceptances, roll them into a bludgeoning device, and donk your adviser.
This is malpractice.Lol I really want to. He's holding my LORs hostage.
This is malpractice.
I'm so sorry. Let the trustees know about this when you are safely in med school.I can't do anything about it. He's well-protected by the school (years of complaints haven't ousted him) and closely attached to admissions people at the schools I'm interested in. I used to respect his opinion but during our conversation today, he suggested I apply to Caribbean schools. That tipped me off to him being malignant.
I really need to stress this. Once you're safely set in your med school spot, for the situation he put you in, and for the sake of future med students, please report this. His actions are absolutely unacceptable.I'm so sorry. Let the trustees know about this when you are safely in med school.
This is not really directed at the OP but what I hate most about SDN is people with 35+ MCAT scores wondering if they are in bad shape.
How can people intelligent enough to score that high on the exam be so neurotic and insecure about their credentials while at the same time demonstrating an inability to do a simple google search? The numbers never lie, you will be fine. While people like me that scored ~50% on VR not so much.
I can't do anything about it. He's well-protected by the school (years of complaints haven't ousted him) and closely attached to admissions people at the schools I'm interested in. I used to respect his opinion but during our conversation today, he suggested I apply to Caribbean schools. That tipped me off to him being malignant.
Whatever it takes, get a new advisor, complain to his Chair and whoever is the Chair of the committee, or get your LOR writers to submit via Interfolio and not through your committee. Your advisor is literally sabotaging your medical career.
I'm just curious, but how did you prepare for the exam, specifically the psych portion?
Whatever it takes, get a new advisor, complain to his Chair and whoever is the Chair of the committee, or get your LOR writers to submit via Interfolio and not through your committee. Your advisor is literally sabotaging your medical career.
A more general question, but why are so many pre-health advisors so *****ic? I feel like cases such as this one occur far more frequently than cases of good advisors (though this maybe due to reporting bias)...
But yeah, OP, don't retake that...