Agree with @Mr.Smile12 but there are a couple of strategic considerations that he also may agree with and @Goro may have something to say:
1. As @Mr.Smile12 noted, Statistics matter and when they do not (meaning that they are good enough), demographics matter, and when they do not, then probability of acceptance matter (and in certain cases, fit to class does). I'll use Iowa as an example. If someone from New England applied with those stats, even though they would on paper be admissible barring any red flags, Iowa is not as likely to offer even an interview as we're pretty confident that the applicant is just reaching out and will probably get better offers closer to home (as well as a state mandate to prefer local students or students from Iowa high schools and were residents). Mayo on the other hand would be more likely to extend an interview as geography matters less for them for their applicants, but if they are not research oriented, the stats do not matter as Mayo prefers research-focused applicants or wildcards even without outstanding stats.
2. The school has a red flag or botches their support of their undergrads in application for Medicine. There are certain liberal arts schools particularly in the Northeast (one in rural Pennsylvania that is certainly on ours at present) that have a bad reputation despite the stats for sending behavior problems or is considered to be poor at science education. Before they cleaned up (literally had to abolish Greek Life to make the point finally), Dartmouth was in that category due to well-known postadmission problems from certain Greek life undergraduates. Sure, they'll make Tuck and be more financially successful than medical students, but there used to be a large antipathy for certain demographic profiles from that school. It's something that I warn high school students about when applying to them, you might want to ask around how the pre-professional student services office runs their support. In the late 90s (which is not true currently as they have reformed), Arizona State University used to have an awful pre-professional student services that the in-state medical school tolerated applications that did not have their formal process done as it was routinely lost in the bureaucracy or otherwise messed up.
3. Your daughter has a deficiency in the application that is not numerically related. It could be as simple as not having enough experience in volunteering, research, or clinical. It could be poor LoRs (I have seen statistically outstanding applicants with LoRs that are negative or worse "call me" LoRs that turn out to be warnings). The background check came back positive (this is not a good thing).
This is all before the interview phase. I have seen perfect paper applicants completely bomb the interview or do stupid things after the initial acceptance to jeopardize the application.
I have no idea without seeing the application myself (and you are not privy to all of it), but count the blessings and figure out which to accept based on what she wants to do. Without knowing any better, I guess 1 would be the most applicable if the other parts of the application are reasonable.
