Snack WWars (Game Thread)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
tbh I'm not sure how to use this. It's super impressive (and pretty!) but I'm a little lost
I find the data useful.

For example when you look at Clem you can see he doesn't have a net negative interaction with a single living player in this game except for SAR and even then just barely.
 
I find the data useful.

For example when you look at Clem you can see he doesn't have a net negative interaction with a single living player in this game except for SAR and even then just barely.
And that correlation tells you that anyone who had negative interactions with him gets killed?
 
I find the data useful.

For example when you look at Clem you can see he doesn't have a net negative interaction with a single living player in this game except for SAR and even then just barely.
Actually other than me, SQB also doesn't have any net negative interactions with living players, other than Kitz and again even then just slightly
 
Actually other than me, SQB also doesn't have any net negative interactions with living players, other than Kitz and again even then just slightly
…does this mean I’m in danger
 
And that correlation tells you that anyone who had negative interactions with him gets killed?
Well it tells me that no one alive in this game is feeling "pushed" by Clem currently.

The Sar thing was from D1 when he was sheeping me, so even that's moot.
 
…does this mean I’m in danger
No, digging into the data there was just a single negative comment from SQB about you from Day 2.

Other than that, (and the fake claim against me of course) SQB doesn't have a sum total of negative actions against any living player.
 
You have time! Just put it on the todo before bed tonight

"9pm - validate SAR."
To be fair, I did request to be tagged in things people wanted me to see!!!

But I'll have time to catch up when I get home
 
View attachment 415219

The names across the top are players and their posts. The names on the side are the subject of the posts.

Up to this point.

Positive posts "I think so and so is village" gets +1, as well as "unvotes".
Negative posts get -1 as well as votes.

The number in the chart is the final sum of those up to this point, more or less. (I might be off with a couple +'s/-'s here or there but it should be mostly accurate.
F Sanck
 
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
 
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
200.gif
 
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
Dubz or zenge but the zenge claims give me pause
 
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
I think the writing was on the wall for scream like, yesterday. Hence the attempt to frame Zenge. So I don't think we get any useful analysis from the vote today unfortunately.
 
Dubz or zenge but the zenge claims give me pause
Kitz pls.

Dubz was the first one to vote SQB, before SQB tried to fake claim.

Dubz isn't bussing packmate SQB in this gamestate 😂
 
Kitz pls.

Dubz was the first one to vote SQB, before SQB tried to fake claim.

Dubz isn't bussing packmate SQB in this gamestate 😂
Good, the plan is working


THIS IS A JOKE
 
In favor of pew pew at screams: Clem


Not in favor of pew pew at screams: screams, chic, beans


Noncommital: rae, kitz, vampy


No comment at all: Zenge, SAR
Also this post is entirely unpairing for SQB/Dubz.

Packmate Dubz would never make this post.
 
Also this post is entirely unpairing for SQB/Dubz.

Packmate Dubz would never make this post.
This reminded me, you said you think Clem is woof with screams, right? I have some qualms with that.
 
Mostly just that he was the first to suggest shooting her. And I think he was on her vote with you d2?

I do remember him having her lock town, arguing with me about his ability to read her, and then very quickly dropping her from that town core at...some point. So idk I could see that being a tactic change because of thread vibes about her slot, maybe.

I don't remember how Clem tends to treat packmates, been a while since I've seen him wolf.
 
as you should!
best olympic sport hands down!! (though I used to figure skate so I may be biased)
Its one of those sports that I wish I had done at some point in my life. I've never even ice skated at all.
 
Mostly just that he was the first to suggest shooting her. And I think he was on her vote with you d2?
Distancing for the first when it honestly seemed like you were fibbing about having a shot at all.

For the second he was in a bit of an awkward situation where he was willing to follow me, but not on SQB? Which I pressed him on and he said SQB was in his town core, which he relented on since he didn't have a good reason to have SQB in the town core by his own admission, and only then did her vote her.

This data is pretty damning.
Aside from still being at a net positive on SQB, what's abundantly clear here is that he's trying to hard to not make any enemies. With the exception of SAR, which only exists from sheeping me D1, Clem has not one single net negative unilateral interactions total (NNUIT) with any living player. That's not normal. That's not a village spread.
 
Distancing for the first when it honestly seemed like you were fibbing about having a shot at all.

For the second he was in a bit of an awkward situation where he was willing to follow me, but not on SQB? Which I pressed him on and he said SQB was in his town core, which he relented on since he didn't have a good reason to have SQB in the town core by his own admission, and only then did her vote her.

This data is pretty damning.

Aside from still being at a net positive on SQB, what's abundantly clear here is that he's trying to hard to not make any enemies. With the exception of SAR, which only exists from sheeping me D1, Clem has not one single net negative unilateral interactions total (NNUIT) with any living player. That's not normal. That's not a village spread.
That's logical

I'm just upset he said to my face that I'm easy to pocket. The audacity!
 
View attachment 415219

The names across the top are players and their posts. The names on the side are the subject of the posts.

Up to this point.

Positive posts "I think so and so is village" gets +1, as well as "unvotes".
Negative posts get -1 as well as votes.

The number in the chart is the final sum of those up to this point, more or less. (I might be off with a couple +'s/-'s here or there but it should be mostly accurate.
I'm looking at this more closely and there's so much parent/child violence

samac and Spurs

Zenge and fruit

Me and apop 😭
 
Why am I last of the village reads sad_angry
Well
- Vampy has to be town mechanically as a Mason
- Rae has to be village since she vouched for my night action - if she was wolfing with SQB she could have lied, gotten village to yeet me, and potentially won the game
- SAR you village read yourself! Which is more heavily weighted because regardless of your affiliation, I know I can trust your SAR read to be accurate here.
 
SAR you village read yourself! Which is more heavily weighted because regardless of your affiliation, I know I can trust your SAR read to be accurate here.
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
 
Top Bottom